Cited by 440Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Super-Horizon Scale Dynamics of Multi-Scalar Inflation

Open access
Sasaki, M., Tanaka, T.·1998·Progress of Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We consider the dynamics of a multi-component scalar field on super-horizon scales in the context of inflationary cosmology. We present a method to solve the perturbation equations on super-horizon scales, i.e., in the long wavelength limit, by using only the knowledge of spatially homogeneous background solutions. In so doing, we clarify the relation between the perturbation equations in the long wavelength limit and the background equations. Then, as a natural extension of our formalism, we provide a strategy to study super-horizon scale perturbations beyond the standard linear perturbation theory. Namely, we reformulate our method so as to take into account the nonlinear dynamics of the scalar field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1143/ptp.99.763

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scalar fields need not only couple through the potential but may also couple kinetically.

    “Generally, the scalar fields need not only couple through the potential, but may also couple kinetically [44, 45, 46, 47].”
  • In the limit t_c → t_*, the nonlinear parameter for purely adiabatic perturbations in the two-field case coincides with the single field case result.

    “which coincides with the single field case result [5, 36].”

    From Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation (2006) · cites this paper as [36]

    Section 3 (pp. 12–15) develops a quasi-nonlinear treatment of multi-scalar perturbations, but the readable passages do not state a result for a nonlinear parameter in the limit t_c → t_*. Searches for that limit, a two-field adiabatic comparison, and f_NL found no passage establishing the claimed agreement with the single-field result; relevant formulas in our copy are undecoded. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]5. PLANCK homepage at http://astro.estec.esa.nl/SA-general/Projects/Cobras. - J. Garicia-Bellido and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996), 5437. - 3) D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinski, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994), 6123. - V. F. Mukhanov and P. J. Steinhardt, astro-ph/9710038. - 5) A. Taruya and Y. Nambu, gr-qc/9709035. - 4) M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96 (1996), 71. - 6) H. Kodama and T. Hamazaki, gr-qc/9712045. - 8) V. F. Mukhanov, Sov. Phys. -JETP 67 (1988), 1297. - 7) H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 78 (1984), 1. - 9) K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 48 (1972), 1503; 50 (1973), 1285; 54 (1975), 730; 67 (1982), 1076. - K. Tomita and N. Deruelle, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994), 7216. - 10) D. S. Salopek and J. M. Stewart, Class. Quant. Grav. 9 (1992), 1943. - D. S. Salopek, J. M. Stewart and J. Parry, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993), 719. - J. Parry, D. S. Salopek and J. M. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994), 2872. - Y. Nambu and A. Taruya, Class. Quant. Grav. 13 (1996), 705. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sasaki, M., & Tanaka, T.
Affiliations
The University of Osaka (JP)
Venue
Progress of Theoretical Physics
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
763-781
ISSN
  • 0033-068X (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-4081
OpenAlex
W2147453274
Cited by
440
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress of Theoretical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
long-wavelength limit, scalar perturbations, cosmic inflation, linear perturbation theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review