The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classical Black Hole Evaporation in Randall-Sundrum Infinite Braneworld
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For d ≥ 4, it was qualitatively argued the obstruction to having static quantum black holes can be understood as a consequence of backreaction due to Hawking effects, such that any black hole that localizes on the brane must evaporate.
“In [22,34], for d ≥ 4, it was qualitatively argued the obstruction to having static quantum black holes can be understood as a consequence of backreaction due to Hawking effects, such that any black hole that localizes on the brane must evaporate.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
The conjecture that classical bulk black holes correspond to quantum-corrected black holes on the brane, in principle, holds in arbitrary spacetime dimensions.
“Indeed, while we focus on three-dimensional quantum black holes, the conjecture [22,34] that classical bulk black holes correspond to quantum-corrected black holes on the brane, in principle, holds in arbitrary spacetime dimensions.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
One possibility, originally put forth in [34] (see also [199]), is that the semi-classical evaporation is linked to a classical instability of the bulk five-dimensional solution.
“One possibility, originally put forth in [34] (see also [199]) is that the semi-classical evaporation is linked to a classical instability of the bulk five-dimensional solution.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
This theorem, and the dearth of evidence of exact static black holes localizing in the RS-II construction circa 2002, in part motivated Tanaka and Emparan, Fabbri, and Kaloper to conjecture higher-dimensional braneworld black holes must be time-dependent.
“This theorem, and the dearth of evidence of exact static black holes localizing in the RS-II construction (circa 2002), in part motivated Tanaka [34] and Emparan, Fabbri, and Kaloper [22] to conjecture higher-dimensional braneworld black holes must be time-dependent (see also [198]).”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
Other bulk black solutions evaporate due to a Gregory-Laflamme instability, as originally suggested in [22,34].
“Indeed, while some bulk black holes get stuck on the brane and never shrink ('black droplets') [71] and hence dynamically stable, there are other bulk black solutions that evaporate due to a Gregory-Laflamme instability [72], as originally suggested in [22,34].”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- P. Horava and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 460, 506 (1996);
- P. Horava and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 475, 94 (1996).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998);
- I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998).
- L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
- L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999).
- T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024012 (2000).
- J. Garriga and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2778 (2000).
- S.B. Giddings, E. Katz and L. Randall, JHEP 0003, 023 (2000).
- T. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 104, 545 (2000).
- I. Giannakis and H. c. Ren, Phys. Rev. D 63, 024001 (2001).
- H. Kudoh and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 64, 084022 (2001).
- T. Wiseman, hep-th/0111057. · arXiv
- A limitted but interesting analysis on gravitational col- lapse on the brane was done by M. Bruni, C. Germani and R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 231302 (2001).
- A. Chamblin, S. W. Hawking and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D 61, 065007 (2000).
- R. Gregory, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, L125 (2000).
- G. T. Horowitz and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 131301 (2001).
- M. J. Duff and J. T. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2052 (2000).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanaka, T.
- Venue
- Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 148
- Pages
- 307-316
- ISSN
- 0375-9687
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
