Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemostratigraphy of the Jurassic System: applications, limitations and implications for palaeoceanography

Open access
Jenkyns, Hugh C., Jones, Charles E., GrÖcke, Darren R., Hesselbo, Stephen P., Parkinson, D. Neil·2002·Journal of the Geological Society

Abstract

Current chemostratigraphical studies of the Jurassic System primarily involve the use of one sedimentary component (marine organic carbon), one divalent transition metal substituted in carbonate (manganese), and two isotopic tracers: strontium-isotope ratios ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) and carbon-isotope ratios (δ 13 C carb and δ 13 C org ) in carbonate and in organic matter. Other parameters such as Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios in calcite, oxygen-isotope ratios (δ 18 O) in carbonate, sulphur-isotope ratios (δ 34 S) in carbonate-hosted sulphate, nitrogen-isotope ratios (δ 15 N org ) in organic matter, osmium-isotope ratios ( 187 Os/ 188 Os) in black shales and neodymium-isotope ratios ( 143 Nd/ 144 Nd) in various mineral phases are also useful but at present give poor resolution because the database is incomplete or compromised by various factors. Stratigraphical patterns in total organic carbon (TOC) can be of either local or regional significance, depending on the lateral extent of the former nutrient-rich and productive water mass. Divalent manganese follows a similar pattern, being concentrated, most probably as a very early diagenetic phase, only in oxygen-depleted waters that typically underlie zones of elevated organic productivity. Shifts in Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios on the time scale of ammonite subzones seem largely to reflect temperature changes. Strontium-isotope ratios from pristine skeletal calcite provide a global signal; δ 13 C values from carbonates with minimal diagenetic overprint potentially do the same, although small spatial differences in palaeo-water-mass composition may have been locally significant. Oxygen-isotope determinations on carbonate rocks and fossils generally yield values that are too scattered to be stratigraphically useful, because they reflect palaeotemperature, the evaporation–precipitation balance in sea water and the impact of any diagenesis involving an aqueous phase. Nitrogen-isotope ratios in organic matter reflect the chemistry of ancient water masses as affected by nitrate utilization and denitrification, and the stratigraphical pattern of this parameter is more likely to correlate only on a regional basis. Neodymium-isotope ratios in sea water are also water mass dependent and greatly affected by regional sources and oceanic current systems. Preliminary data on sulphur-isotope ratios in carbonates and osmium-isotope ratios in organic-rich shales, both potentially offering global correlation, indicate that these tracers may be valuable, although the records at present are not sufficiently well established to allow high-resolution regional correlation. In all cases, biostratigraphically well-dated reference sections, against which the relevant geochemical data have been calibrated, are required in the first instance. To date, studies on the stratigraphical distribution of organic carbon have been principally carried out in both northern (Boreal) and southern (Tethyan) Europe; carbon-isotope stratigraphy has been undertaken primarily, but not exclusively, on bulk pelagic sediments from the Alpine–Mediterranean or Tethyan domain; and strontium-isotope stratigraphy has been undertaken largely on calcitic skeletal material (belemnites and oysters) from northern and southern Europe. In many sections, including those containing ammonites, multi-parameter chemostratigraphy can give resolution that exceeds that attainable by classic biostratigraphical means. Strontium-isotope ratios in skeletal calcite are a particularly powerful tool for illustrating changes in sedimentary rate and revealing gaps in the stratigraphical record.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/0016-764901-130

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
Jenkyns, H. C., Jones, C. E., GrÖcke, D. R., Hesselbo, S. P., & Parkinson, D. N.
Venue
Journal of the Geological Society
Published
2002-07
Volume
159
Issue
4
Pages
351-378
ISSN
  • 0016-7649 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-479X
OpenAlex
W2039810558
Cited by
590
References
6
FWCI
15.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemostratigraphy of the Jurassic System: applications, limitations and implications for palaeoceanography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/0016-764901-130
The paper
Jenkyns, H. C., Jones, C. E., GrÖcke, D. R., Hesselbo, S. P., & Parkinson, D. N. (2002). Chemostratigraphy of the Jurassic System: applications, limitations and implications for palaeoceanography. Journal of the Geological Society. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764901-130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.