The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon-isotope stratigraphy recorded by the Cenomanian–Turonian Oceanic Anoxic Event: correlation and implications based on three key localities
Abstract
We present new, detailed carbon-isotope records for bulk carbonate, total organic carbon (TOC) and phytane from three key sections spanning the Cenomanian–Turonian boundary interval (Eastbourne, England; Gubbio, Italy; Tarfaya, Morocco), with the purpose of establishing a common chemostratigraphic framework for Oceanic Anoxic Event (OAE) 2. Isotope curves from all localities are characterized by a positive carbon-isotope excursion of c . 4‰ for TOC and phytane and c . 2.5‰ for carbonate, although diagenetic overprinting appears to have obliterated the primary carbonate carbon-isotope signal in at least part of the Tarfaya section. Stratigraphically, peak δ 13 C values for all components are followed by intervals of high, near-constant δ 13 C in the form of an isotopic plateau. Recognition of an unambiguous return to background δ 13 C values above the plateau is, however, contentious in all sections, hence no firm chemostratigraphic marker for the end-point of the positive isotopic excursion can be established. The stratigraphically consistent first appearance of the calcareous nannofossil Quadrum gartneri at or near the Cenomanian–Turonian boundary as established by ammonite stratigraphy, in conjunction with the end of the δ 13 C maximum characteristic of the isotopic plateau, provides a potentially powerful tool for delimiting the stratigraphic extent and duration of OAE 2. This Oceanic Anoxic Event is demonstrated to be largely, if not wholly, confined to the latest part of the Cenomanian stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cretaceous oceanic anoxic event 2 triggered by a massive magmatic episode
Turgeon, S. C., & Creaser, R. A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07076 · Cited by 502
Lithium isotope evidence for enhanced weathering during Oceanic Anoxic Event 2
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Jenkyns, H. C., & Woodfine, R. G. (2013) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1875 · Cited by 419
Self-citationEvolving ideas about the Cretaceous climate and ocean circulation
Hay, W. W. (2008) · Cretaceous Research · doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2008.05.025 · Cited by 355
Jarvis, I., Lignum, J. S., Gröcke, D. R., Jenkyns, H. C., & Pearce, M. A. (2011) · Paleoceanography · doi:10.1029/2010pa002081 · Cited by 342
Self-citationIodine to calcium ratios in marine carbonate as a paleo-redox proxy during oceanic anoxic events
Lu, Z., Jenkyns, H. C., & Rickaby, R. E. M. (2010) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g31145.1 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsikos, H., Jenkyns, H. C., Walsworth-Bell, B., Petrizzo, M. R., Forster, A., Kolonic, S., Erba, E., Premoli Silva, I., Baas, M., Wagner, T., & Sinninghe DamstÉ, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the Geological Society
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 711-719
- ISSN
- 0016-7649 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-479X
- OpenAlex
- W2151375251
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon-isotope stratigraphy recorded by the Cenomanian–Turonian Oceanic Anoxic Event: correlation and implications based on three key localities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/0016-764903-077
- The paper
- Tsikos, H., Jenkyns, H. C., Walsworth-Bell, B., Petrizzo, M. R., Forster, A., Kolonic, S., Erba, E., Premoli Silva, I., Baas, M., Wagner, T., & Sinninghe DamstÉ, J. S. (2004). Carbon-isotope stratigraphy recorded by the Cenomanian–Turonian Oceanic Anoxic Event: correlation and implications based on three key localities. Journal of the Geological Society. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764903-077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.