Sedimentation of the Phyllopod Bed within the Cambrian Burgess Shale Formation of British Columbia
Abstract
We provide the most detailed sedimentological log to date through the Phyllopod Bed of the mid-Cambrian Burgess Shale Formation of British Columbia, based on millimetre-scale logging of a suite of thin sections. The sedimentary facies is dominated by alternations of homogeneous mudstone and a coarser-grained, laminated, variably sandy and shelly mudstone that is locally micronodular. Most boundaries between these two lithologies are gradational, and discrete fining-upwards turbidite units were rarely recognized. Such a pattern is interpreted to indicate rapid sedimentation of up to decimetre-thick units at this location from pulsatory, quasi-continuous density currents consistent with earlier proposals of exceptional preservation through rapid burial; the density currents responsible were probably largely akin to mud-rich slurries, helping explain the transport and entombment of the fossils. The homogeneous mudstone units are characterized by numerous distinctive lenses of pyrite framboids or subeuhedral crystals, previously interpreted as small ripples. Their 3D shape, however, suggests an origin as subspherical early diagenetic aggregates; their present morphology is consistent with the high levels of compaction inferred from the preservation of fossils.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Claystone beds are cemented by pervasive micron-sized authigenic calcium carbonates, which are concentrated at bed tops and penetrate downward.
“Claystone beds are cemented by pervasive micron-sized authigenic calcium carbonates (9, 17), which are concentrated at bed tops and penetrate downward (Fig. 2 B–E and SI Appendix, Figs. S2–S4).”
From Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation (2012) · cites this paper as [17]
In most BST deposits, event-deposited claystone beds range from approximately 1 to 15 mm in thickness, but in the Chengjiang and Burgess Shale, event beds up to 8-cm thick are present.
“In most BST deposits, event-deposited claystone beds range from approximately 1 to 15 mm in thickness, but in the Chengjiang and Burgess Shale, event beds up to 8-cm thick are present (17, 18).”
From Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation (2012) · cites this paper as [17]
Soft-bodied fossils were rapidly entombed within this facies.
“Evidence for rapid entombment of soft-bodied fossils (16–18) within this facies is provided by randomly oriented clay microfabrics, indicating event-driven deposition of claystones from bottom-flowing density currents (19) (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S2) and by the chaotic orientations of soft-bodied fossils within individual claystone beds (20, 21).”
From Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation (2012) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Organic preservation of non-mineralizing organisms and the taphonomy of the Burgess Shale
Butterfield, N. J. (1990) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300009994 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Secular distribution of Burgess-Shale-type preservation
Butterfield, N. J. (1995) · Lethaia · doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01587.x · Cited by 255 · cited 10× · see citing works
“…suggestion relies on a preponderance of reactive and/or swelling clays in the sediments of the Cambrian Gondwanan continental margins; these clays were held responsible for prohibiting bacterial degradation of arthropod cuticle and other reasonably recalcitrant organic tissues (Butterfield 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialPost-Cambrian closure of the deep-water slope-basin taphonomic window
Orr, P. J., Benton, M. J., & Briggs, D. E. G. (2003) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g19193.1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation
Gaines, R. R., Hammarlund, E. U., Hou, X., Qi, C., Gabbott, S. E., Zhao, Y., Peng, J., & Canfield, D. E. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111784109 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Self-citationBurgess shale-type preservation and its distribution in space and time
Gaines, R. R. (2014) · The Paleontological Society Papers · doi:10.1017/s1089332600002837 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gabbott, S. E., Zalasiewicz, J., & Collins, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- 26 Belvedere Blvd, Toronto, Ontario, M8X1K1, Canada
- Venue
- Journal of the Geological Society
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 307-318
- ISSN
- 0016-7649 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-479X
- OpenAlex
- W2074012580
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Geological Society (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Keywords
- Cambrian, sedimentology, mudstone, gravity currents, turbidites, rapid sedimentation, exceptional preservation, framboidal pyrite, early diagenesis, compaction, British Columbia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review