Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Orogenic uplift and collapse, crustal thickness, fabrics and metamorphic phase changes: the role of eclogites

Dewey, J. F., Ryan, P. D., Andersen, T. B.·1993·Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Abstract

Coesite-bearing eclogites in several deep crustal metamorphic assemblages now exposed in extensionally-collapsed orogens indicate the tectonic denudation of more than 90 km of crustal rocks and pre-collapsed crustal thicknesses of at least 120 km. For mountain ranges and orogenic plateaux up to 5 km in elevation and average crustal densities of about 2.8, crustal thickness cannot exceed about 80 km unless pre-shortening crustal/lithosphere thickness ratios were less than 0.135 or some way can be found to preferentially thicken the lithospheric mantle. This problem can be avoided and very thick orogenic crusts built up if granulite facies rocks transform to denser eclogite facies during shortening, where the petrographic Moho is continuously depressed below a density/seismic velocity Moho buffered at about 70 km and mountains at about 3 km. Advective thinning of the lithosphere combined with the resultant heating and eclogite to sillimanite-granulite/amphibolite transformation causes surface uplift of about 2 km, a rapid change in isostatic compensation level, and a switch from a shortening to an extensional/collapse regime. We have developed a simple numerical model based upon field observations in southwestern Norway in which coherent regional-scale transformation of lower crustal rocks to eclogite facies during lithospheric shortening is followed by heating, transformation of eclogite to amphibolite and granulite, extension, and crustal thinning by coaxial then non-coaxial mechanisms. The model also explains strong lower crustal layering (eclogite and other lenses in horizontally-extended amphibolites), regionally horizontal gneissic fabrics, rapid return from orogenic to ‘normal’ crustal thickness with minor erosion, the lateral and vertical juxtaposition of low-grade and high-grade rocks and rapid marine transgression shortly after orogeny.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/gsl.sp.1993.076.01.16

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Dewey, J. F., Ryan, P. D., & Andersen, T. B.
Venue
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published
1993-01
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
325-343
ISSN
  • 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4927
OpenAlex
W2027209201
Cited by
189
References
2
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orogenic uplift and collapse, crustal thickness, fabrics and metamorphic phase changes: the role of eclogites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/gsl.sp.1993.076.01.16
The paper
Dewey, J. F., Ryan, P. D., & Andersen, T. B. (1993). Orogenic uplift and collapse, crustal thickness, fabrics and metamorphic phase changes: the role of eclogites. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1993.076.01.16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.