The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of chemical reactions on CO 2 storage in geological formations: a brief review
Abstract
The sequestration of CO 2 in the deep geosphere is one potential method for reducing anthropogenic emissions to the atmosphere without a drastic change in our energy-producing technologies. Immediately after injection, the CO 2 will be stored as a free phase within the host rock. Over time it will dissolve into the local formation water and initiate a variety of geochemical reactions. Some of these reactions could be beneficial, helping to chemically contain or ‘trap’ the CO 2 as dissolved species and by the formation of new carbonate minerals; others may be deleterious, and actually aid the migration of CO 2 . It will be important to understand the overall impact of these competing processes. However, these processes will also be dependent upon the structure, mineralogy and hydrogeology of the specific lithologies concerned and the chemical stability of the engineered features (principally, the cement and steel components in the well completions). Therefore, individual storage operations will have to take account of local geological, fluid chemical and hydrogeological conditions. The aim of this paper is to review some of the possible chemical reactions that might occur once CO 2 is injected underground, and to highlight their possible impacts on long-term CO 2 storage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sleipner vest CO2 disposal, CO2 injection into a shallow underground aquifer
Baklid, A., Korbol, R., & Owren, G. (1996) · SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.2118/36600-ms · Cited by 217
Cited by
Hermesmann, M., & Müller, T. E. (2022) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2022.100996 · Cited by 717
Ali, M., Jha, N. K., Pal, N., Keshavarz, A., Hoteit, H., & Sarmadivaleh, M. (2022) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103895 · Cited by 490
Mineral sequestration of carbon dioxide in basalt: A pre-injection overview of the CarbFix project
Gislason, S. R., Wolff-Boenisch, D., Stefansson, A., Oelkers, E. H., Gunnlaugsson, E., Sigurdardottir, H., Sigfusson, B., Broecker, W. S., Matter, J. M., & Stute, M. (2010) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.013 · Cited by 488
Celia, M. A., Bachu, S., Nordbotten, J. M., & Bandilla, K. W. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017609 · Cited by 465
Geochemical aspects of CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers: A review
De Silva, G. P. D., Ranjith, P. G., & Perera, M. S. A. (2015) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.045 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochelle, C. A., Czernichowski-Lauriol, I., & Milodowski, A. E.
- Venue
- Geological Society, London, Special Publications
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 233
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-106
- ISSN
- 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-4927
- OpenAlex
- W2073972979
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of chemical reactions on CO 2 storage in geological formations: a brief review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1144/gsl.sp.2004.233.01.07
- The paper
- Rochelle, C. A., Czernichowski-Lauriol, I., & Milodowski, A. E. (2004). The impact of chemical reactions on CO 2 storage in geological formations: a brief review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.2004.233.01.07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
