Cited by 164Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The Fezouata fossils of Morocco; an extraordinary record of marine life in the Early Ordovician

Open access
Van Roy, Peter, Briggs, Derek E. G., Gaines, Robert R.·2015·Journal of the Geological Society

Abstract

The discovery of the Fezouata biota in the latest Tremadocian of southeastern Morocco has significantly changed our understanding of the early Phanerozoic radiation. The shelly fossil record shows a well-recognized pattern of macroevolutionary stasis between the Cambrian Explosion and the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event, but the rich soft-bodied Fezouata biota paints a different evolutionary picture. The Fezouata assemblage includes a considerable component of Cambrian holdovers alongside a surprising number of crown group taxa previously unknown to have evolved by the Early Ordovician. Study of the Fezouata biota is in its early stages, and future discoveries will continue to enrich our view of the dynamics of the early Phanerozoic radiation and of the nature of the fossil record. Supplementary material: A complete faunal list is available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18843 .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/jgs2015-017

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Fezouata Shale, complete carcasses of the radiodont Aegirocassis are relatively rare, yet many fragments were easily assigned to this genus.

    “In the Fezouata Shale, complete carcasses of the radiodont Aegirocassis are similarly relatively rare (Saleh et al., 2020b), yet many fragments were easily assigned to this genus (Van Roy, Briggs & Gaines, 2015).”

    From Probability-based preservational variations within the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota (China) (2022) · cites this paper as Van Roy, Briggs & Gaines, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Roy, P., Briggs, D. E. G., & Gaines, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Geology and Geophysics and Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA
  • Yale University (US)
  • Pomona College (US)
Venue
Journal of the Geological Society
Published
2015-07-07
Volume
172
Issue
5
Pages
541-549
ISSN
  • 0016-7649 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-479X
OpenAlex
W2124526279
Cited by
164
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9
FWCI
12.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Geological Society (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1053247)
  • Yale University
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (RALI 197)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Tremadocian, Lower Ordovician, marine fossils, soft-bodied fossils, Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event, Cambrian explosion, fossil record, faunistic checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review