Cited by 41Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchMarine and environmental studies

Microbiotic signatures of the Anthropocene in marginal marine and freshwater palaeoenvironments

Wilkinson, I. P., Poirier, C., Head, M. J., Sayer, C. D., Tibby, J.·2014·Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Abstract

The term ‘Anthropocene’ has been proposed to indicate a geological interval characterized by global anthropogenic environmental change. This paper attempts to recognize a method by which the Anthropocene can be defined micropalaeontologically. In order to do this, microfloras and microfaunas (diatoms, macrophytes, dinoflagellate cysts, foraminifera and ostracods) from nearshore waters through to paralic and freshwater aquatic milieux are considered, and biotic variability with an anthropogenic causation identified. Microbiotic change can be related to anthropogenically induced extinctions, pollution-related mutation, environmentally influenced assemblage variability, geochemistry of carapaces/tests, floral change related to lacustrine acidification, faunal and floral correlation to industrial and agricultural signatures and introduction of exotic species via shipping. The influence of humanity on a local scale can be recognized in assemblages as far back as 5000 years BP. However, widespread anthropogenic change took place in Europe and America, particularly in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, although in Asia (e.g. Japan) it cannot be observed prior to the twentieth century. Profound and global biotic change began in the mid-twentieth century and, if the Anthropocene is to be defined in this way, then the period 1940–1945 might encompass the biotic base of the interval.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/sp395.14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 274 · Cited by 41

Authors
Wilkinson, I. P., Poirier, C., Head, M. J., Sayer, C. D., & Tibby, J.
Affiliations
  • British Geological Survey (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Brock University (CA)
  • University College London (GB)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Venue
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published
2014-01
Volume
395
Issue
1
Pages
185-219
ISSN
  • 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4927
OpenAlex
W2130544464
Cited by
41
References
274
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (bgs05002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and environmental studies
Keywords
Anthropocene, micropaleontology, marginal marine environments, diatoms, dinoflagellate cysts, foraminifera, Ostracoda, aquatic plants, pollution, exotic species introduction, anthropogenic extinction, paleoenvironmental change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review