Microbiotic signatures of the Anthropocene in marginal marine and freshwater palaeoenvironments
Abstract
The term ‘Anthropocene’ has been proposed to indicate a geological interval characterized by global anthropogenic environmental change. This paper attempts to recognize a method by which the Anthropocene can be defined micropalaeontologically. In order to do this, microfloras and microfaunas (diatoms, macrophytes, dinoflagellate cysts, foraminifera and ostracods) from nearshore waters through to paralic and freshwater aquatic milieux are considered, and biotic variability with an anthropogenic causation identified. Microbiotic change can be related to anthropogenically induced extinctions, pollution-related mutation, environmentally influenced assemblage variability, geochemistry of carapaces/tests, floral change related to lacustrine acidification, faunal and floral correlation to industrial and agricultural signatures and introduction of exotic species via shipping. The influence of humanity on a local scale can be recognized in assemblages as far back as 5000 years BP. However, widespread anthropogenic change took place in Europe and America, particularly in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, although in Asia (e.g. Japan) it cannot be observed prior to the twentieth century. Profound and global biotic change began in the mid-twentieth century and, if the Anthropocene is to be defined in this way, then the period 1940–1945 might encompass the biotic base of the interval.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 274 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Wilkinson, I. P., Poirier, C., Head, M. J., Sayer, C. D., & Tibby, J.
- Affiliations
- British Geological Survey (GB)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Brock University (CA)
- University College London (GB)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Venue
- Geological Society, London, Special Publications
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 185-219
- ISSN
- 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-4927
- OpenAlex
- W2130544464
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 274
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (bgs05002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and environmental studies
- Keywords
- Anthropocene, micropaleontology, marginal marine environments, diatoms, dinoflagellate cysts, foraminifera, Ostracoda, aquatic plants, pollution, exotic species introduction, anthropogenic extinction, paleoenvironmental change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review