The mineral signature of the Anthropocene in its deep-time context
Abstract
The Earth has shown a systematic increase in mineral species through its history, with three ‘eras’ comprising ten ‘stages’ identified by Robert Hazen and his colleagues ( Hazen et al. 2008 ), the eras being associated with planetary accretion, crust and mantle reworking and the influence of life, successively. We suggest that a further level in this form of evolution has now taken place of at least ‘stage’ level, where humans have engineered a large and extensive suite of novel, albeit not formally recognized minerals, some of which will leave a geologically significant signal in strata forming today. These include the great majority of metals (that are not found natively), tungsten carbide, boron nitride, novel garnets and many others. A further stratigraphic signal is of minerals that are rare in pre-industrial geology, but are now common at the surface, including mullite (in fired bricks and ceramics), ettringite, hillebrandite and portlandite (in cement and concrete) and ‘mineraloids’ (novel in detail) such as anthropogenic glass. These have become much more common at the Earth's surface since the mid-twentieth century. However, the scale and extent of this new phase of mineral evolution, which represents part of the widespread changes associated with the proposed Anthropocene Epoch, remains uncharted. The International Mineralogical Association (IMA) list of officially accepted minerals explicitly excludes synthetic minerals, and no general inventory of these exists. We propose that the growing geological and societal significance of this phenomenon is now great enough for human-made minerals to be formally listed and catalogued by the IMA, perhaps in conjunction with materials science societies. Such an inventory would enable this phenomenon to be placed more effectively within the context of the 4.6 billion year history of the Earth, and would help characterize the strata of the Anthropocene.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent anthropogenic deposits contain the greatest expansion of new minerals since the Great Oxygenation Event at 2400 Ma, accompanied by many new forms of 'rock'.
“Recent anthropogenic deposits - the products of mining, waste disposal (landfill), construction and urbanization (19) - contain the greatest expansion of new minerals since the Great Oxygenation Event at 2400 Ma ( 20 ), accompanied by many new forms of 'rock' in the broad sense of geological materials with the potential for long-term persistence.”
From The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
Elemental aluminum has seen 98% of its cumulative global production of ~500 Tg since 1950 C.E.
“elemental aluminum, almost unknown in native form before the 19 th century, has seen 98% of its cumulative global production of ~500 Tg since 1950 C.E. ( 20, 22 ; Fig. 2A).”
From The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Zalasiewicz, J., Kryza, R., & Williams, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- University of Wrocław (PL)
- Venue
- Geological Society, London, Special Publications
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2013-12-19
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-117
- ISSN
- 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-4927
- OpenAlex
- W2129710825
- Semantic Scholar
- 97d44aa6a05386fb488426f49d8fa8c18b8734ac
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
- Keywords
- Anthropocene, mineralogical evolution, synthetic minerals, mineral inventory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review