Definition of the Anthropocene: a view from the underworld
Abstract
Annually laminated stalagmites from natural caves and limestone mines capture a number of significant environmental and climatic signals during the anthropogenically disturbed era. The effects of forest clearance, or development of agricultural or industrial practices, can be marked by changes in soil or hydrological responses leading to shifts in both chemical (e.g. carbon and oxygen isotope ratios or trace elements) and physical (e.g. fabric, thickness of laminae) signals. However, these signals are diachronous because of the spatial heterogeneity of human societies. Twentieth-century changes in atmospheric composition are known from speleothems at several sites and demonstrate pollution disturbance of the sulphur cycle and the signal provided by the 1950s rise in radiocarbon caused by atmospheric nuclear tests. This latter is a global signal and hence a strong candidate to define the start of the Anthropocene, although other considerations, including comparison with instrumental archives, would favour an earlier timing. An attractive option is the climate amelioration marking the end of the Little Ice Age in the mid-nineteenth century, which is marked in Alpine and other Northern Hemisphere areas. Examples are illustrated from the Grotta di Ernesto cave to illustrate the appearance of a putative mid-nineteenth-century boundary.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The worldwide fallout from nuclear bomb explosions is easily identifiable in the chemostratigraphic record.
“additional bombs were detonated at the average rate of one every 9.6 days until 1988 with attendant worldwide fallout easily identifiable in the chemostratigraphic record.”
From When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal (2015) · cites this paper as Fairchild and Frisia, 2014
The global spread of artificial radionuclides from surface A-bomb explosions is a stratigraphic marker of the mid-twentieth century.
“the global spread of artificial radionuclides from surface A-bomb explosions (Fairchild and Frisia, 2014;Hancock et al., 2014;Wolff, 2014);”
From When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal (2015) · cites this paper as Fairchild and Frisia, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Fairchild, I. J., & Frisia, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Geological Society, London, Special Publications
- Publisher
- Geological Society of London
- Published
- 2013-10-24
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 239-254
- ISSN
- 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-4927
- OpenAlex
- W1974057326
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
- Keywords
- Anthropocene, stalagmites, speleothems, cave records, carbon-14, atmospheric nuclear tests, sulphur cycle, Little Ice Age, climate amelioration, forest clearing, carbon and oxygen isotopes, trace elements, limestone mine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review