The DOI matches its Crossref record.
One-way functions are necessary and sufficient for secure signatures
Open accessAbstract
Much research in theoretical cryptography has been centered around finding the weakest possible cryptographic assumptions required to implement major primitives. Ever since Diffie and Hellman first suggested that modern
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Handbook of applied cryptography
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4512 · Cited by 10,357
Entity Authentication and Key Distribution
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48329-2_21 · Cited by 1,752
How to time-stamp a digital document
Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1991) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/bf00196791 · Cited by 1,483
Dolev, D., Dwork, C., & Naor, M. (1991) · Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '91 · doi:10.1145/103418.103474 · Cited by 990
Bellare, M., Micciancio, D., & Warinschi, B. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-39200-9_38 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Rompel, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the twenty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '90
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1990
- Pages
- 387-394
- OpenAlex
- W2074594718
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One-way functions are necessary and sufficient for secure signatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/100216.100269
- The paper
- Rompel, J. (1990). One-way functions are necessary and sufficient for secure signatures. Proceedings of the twenty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '90. https://doi.org/10.1145/100216.100269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
