The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptive routing with end-to-end feedback: distributed learning and geometric approaches
Abstract
Minimal delay routing is a fundamental task in networks. Since delays depend on the (potentially unpredictable) traffic distribution, online delay optimization can be quite challenging. While uncertainty about the current network delays may make the current routing choices sub-optimal, the algorithm can nevertheless try to learn the traffic patterns and keep adapting its choice of routing paths so as to perform nearly as well as the best static path. This online shortest path problem is a special case of online linear optimization, a problem in which an online algorithm must choose, in each round, a strategy from some compact set S ⊆ Rd so as to try to minimize a linear cost function which is only revealed at the end of the round. Kalai and Vempala[4] gave an algorithm for such problems in the transparent feedback model, where the entire cost function is revealed at the end of the round. Here we present an algorithm for online linear optimization in the more challenging opaque feedback model, in which only the cost of the chosen strategy is revealed at the end of the round. In the special case of shortest paths, opaque feedback corresponds to the notion that in each round the algorithm learns only the end-to-end cost of the chosen path, not the cost of every edge in the network.We also present a second algorithm for online shortest paths, which solves the shortest-path problem using a chain of online decision oracles, one at each node of the graph. This has several advantages over the online linear optimization approach. First, it is effective against an adaptive adversary, whereas our linear optimization algorithm assumes an oblivious adversary. Second, even in the case of an oblivious adversary, the second algorithm performs better than the first, as measured by their additive regret.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2008) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 581
Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Lugosi, G. (2012) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2012.01.001 · Cited by 319
Bandit Convex Optimization for Scalable and Dynamic IoT Management
Chen, T., & Giannakis, G. B. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2839563 · Cited by 139
Harnessing Bandit Online Learning to Low-Latency Fog Computing
Chen, T., & Giannakis, G. B. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2018.8461641 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Awerbuch, B., & Kleinberg, R. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-06-13
- Pages
- 45-53
- OpenAlex
- W2014482607
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive routing with end-to-end feedback: distributed learning and geometric approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1007352.1007367
- The paper
- Awerbuch, B., & Kleinberg, R. D. (2004). Adaptive routing with end-to-end feedback: distributed learning and geometric approaches. Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/1007352.1007367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.