The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrating vertical and horizontal partitioning into automated physical database design
Abstract
In addition to indexes and materialized views, horizontal and vertical partitioning are important aspects of physical design in a relational database system that significantly impact performance. Horizontal partitioning also provides manageability; database administrators often require indexes and their underlying tables partitioned identically so as to make common operations such as backup/restore easier. While partitioning is important, incorporating partitioning makes the problem of automating physical design much harder since: (a) The choices of partitioning can strongly interact with choices of indexes and materialized views. (b) A large new space of physical design alternatives must be considered. (c) Manageability requirements impose a new constraint on the problem. In this paper, we present novel techniques for designing a scalable solution to this integrated physical design problem that takes both performance and manageability into account. We have implemented our techniques and evaluated it on Microsoft SQL Server. Our experiments highlight: (a) the importance of taking an integrated approach to automated physical design and (b) the scalability of our techniques. 1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Automatic Database Management System Tuning Through Large-scale Machine Learning
Van Aken, D., Pavlo, A., Gordon, G. J., & Zhang, B. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3035918.3064029 · Cited by 573
Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient data
Vepakomma, P., Gupta, O., Swedish, T., & Raskar, R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.00564 · Cited by 513
Size Bounds for Factorised Representations of Query Results
Olteanu, D., & Závodný, J. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/2656335 · Cited by 116
Ma, Y., Dey, T., Bogart, C., Amreen, S., Valiev, M., Tutko, A., Kennard, D., Zaretzki, R., & Mockus, A. (2021) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-020-09905-9 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Agrawal, S., Narasayya, V., & Yang, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-06-13
- Pages
- 359-370
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997375126
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating vertical and horizontal partitioning into automated physical database design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1007568.1007609
- The paper
- Agrawal, S., Narasayya, V., & Yang, B. (2004). Integrating vertical and horizontal partitioning into automated physical database design. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. https://doi.org/10.1145/1007568.1007609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.