The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PocketLens: Toward a personal recommender system
Abstract
Recommender systems using collaborative filtering are a popular technique for reducing information overload and finding products to purchase. One limitation of current recommenders is that they are not portable. They can only run on large computers connected to the Internet. A second limitation is that they require the user to trust the owner of the recommender with personal preference data. Personal recommenders hold the promise of delivering high quality recommendations on palmtop computers, even when disconnected from the Internet. Further, they can protect the user's privacy by storing personal information locally, or by sharing it in encrypted form. In this article we present the new PocketLens collaborative filtering algorithm along with five peer-to-peer architectures for finding neighbors. We evaluate the architectures and algorithms in a series of offline experiments. These experiments show that Pocketlens can run on connected servers, on usually connected workstations, or on occasionally connected portable devices, and produce recommendations that are as good as the best published algorithms to date.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SETI@home: an experiment in public-resource computing
Anderson, D. P., Cobb, J., Korpela, E., Lebofsky, M., & Werthimer, D. (2002) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/581571.581573 · Cited by 1,302
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
(2013) · doi:10.1145/2441776 · Cited by 601
Cited by
Personalization and privacy: a survey of privacy risks and remedies in personalization-based systems
Toch, E., Wang, Y., & Cranor, L. F. (2012) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9110-z · Cited by 226
Privacy-preserving collaborative recommendations based on random perturbations
Polatidis, N., Georgiadis, C. K., Pimenidis, E., & Mouratidis, H. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.018 · Cited by 80
A systematic review of privacy techniques in recommendation systems
Ogunseyi, T. B., Avoussoukpo, C. B., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-023-00710-1 · Cited by 27
Want to scale in centralized systems? Think P2P
Kermarrec, A.-M., & Taïani, F. (2015) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-015-0029-1 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, B. N., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-476
- ISSN
- 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2868
- OpenAlex
- W2020480318
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.