The DOI matches its Crossref record.
We the media: technology empowers a new grassroots journalism
Abstract
Grassroots journalists are dismantling Big Media's monopoly on the news, transforming it from a lecture to a conversation. Not content to accept the news as reported, these readers-turned-reporters are publishing in real time to a worldwide audience via the Internet. The impact of their work is just beginning to be felt by professional journalists, the newsmakers they cover and especially the former audience, which is now part of the process. The tools are still in the early stages, however, creating substantial needs - and opportunities - for technologist and the new grassroots journalists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice
Barassi, V., & Treré, E. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812445878 · Cited by 166
New media, old criticism: Bloggers’ press criticism and the journalistic field
Vos, T. P., Craft, S., & Ashley, S. (2012) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884911421705 · Cited by 131
THE TREND OF CLASS, RACE, AND ETHNICITY IN SOCIAL MEDIA INEQUALITY: Who still cannot afford to blog?
Schradie, J. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.665939 · Cited by 90
(2024) · doi:10.3390/socsci13050266 · Cited by 11
Citizen journalism: Revisiting the concept and developments
Min, S. J., Salgado, S., & Mutsvairo, B. (2025) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849251327003 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillmor, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-08-09
- Pages
- 270-271
- OpenAlex
- W2002136570
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
