The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosing network-wide traffic anomalies
Open accessAbstract
Anomalies are unusual and significant changes in a network's traffic levels, which can often span multiple links. Diagnosing anomalies is critical for both network operators and end users. It is a difficult problem because one must extract and interpret anomalous patterns from large amounts of high-dimensional, noisy data.In this paper we propose a general method to diagnose anomalies. This method is based on a separation of the high-dimensional space occupied by a set of network traffic measurements into disjoint subspaces corresponding to normal and anomalous network conditions. We show that this separation can be performed effectively by Principal Component Analysis.Using only simple traffic measurements from links, we study volume anomalies and show that the method can: (1) accurately detect when a volume anomaly is occurring; (2) correctly identify the underlying origin-destination (OD) flow which is the source of the anomaly; and (3) accurately estimate the amount of traffic involved in the anomalous OD flow.We evaluate the method's ability to diagnose (i.e., detect, identify, and quantify) both existing and synthetically injected volume anomalies in real traffic from two backbone networks. Our method consistently diagnoses the largest volume anomalies, and does so with a very low false alarm rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Cited by
Detecting large-scale system problems by mining console logs
Xu, W., Huang, L., Fox, A., Patterson, D., & Jordan, M. I. (2009) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 22nd symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/1629575.1629587 · Cited by 1,332
Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Nelson, B., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Tygar, J. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1145/2046684.2046692 · Cited by 1,194
An empirical comparison of botnet detection methods
García, S., Grill, M., Stiborek, J., & Zunino, A. (2014) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.05.011 · Cited by 962
An Overview of IP Flow-Based Intrusion Detection
Sperotto, A., Schaffrath, G., Sadre, R., Morariu, C., Pras, A., & Stiller, B. (2010) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2010.032210.00054 · Cited by 466
A comprehensive survey on network anomaly detection
Fernandes, G., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Carvalho, L. F., Al-Muhtadi, J. F., & Proença, M. L. (2019) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-018-0475-8 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Lakhina, A., Crovella, M., & Diot, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-08-30
- Pages
- 219-230
- OpenAlex
- W2157578436
- Cited by
- 1,039
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosing network-wide traffic anomalies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1015467.1015492
- The paper
- Lakhina, A., Crovella, M., & Diot, C. (2004). Diagnosing network-wide traffic anomalies. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015467.1015492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.