The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactive digital photomontage
Abstract
We describe an interactive, computer-assisted framework for combining parts of a set of photographs into a single composite picture, a process we call "digital photomontage." Our framework makes use of two techniques primarily: graph-cut optimization, to choose good seams within the constituent images so that they can be combined as seamlessly as possible; and gradient-domain fusion, a process based on Poisson equations, to further reduce any remaining visible artifacts in the composite. Also central to the framework is a suite of interactive tools that allow the user to specify a variety of high-level image objectives, either globally across the image, or locally through a painting-style interface. Image objectives are applied independently at each pixel location and generally involve a function of the pixel values (such as "maximum contrast") drawn from that same location in the set of source images. Typically, a user applies a series of image objectives iteratively in order to create a finished composite. The power of this framework lies in its generality; we show how it can be used for a wide variety of applications, including "selective composites" (for instance, group photos in which everyone looks their best), relighting, extended depth of field, panoramic stitching, clean-plate production, stroboscopic visualization of movement, and time-lapse mosaics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
Cited by
A Unified Framework for Street-View Panorama Stitching
Li, L., Yao, J., Xie, R., Xia, M., & Zhang, W. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17010001 · Cited by 873
Kopf, J., Cohen, M. F., Lischinski, D., & Uyttendaele, M. (2007) · ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers · doi:10.1145/1275808.1276497 · Cited by 872
Self-citationScene completion using millions of photographs
Hays, J., & Efros, A. A. (2007) · ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers · doi:10.1145/1275808.1276382 · Cited by 687
Blind Motion Deblurring Using Image Statistics
Levin, A. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0110 · Cited by 396
Face swapping: automatically replacing faces in photographs
Bitouk, D., Kumar, N., Dhillon, S., Belhumeur, P., & Nayar, S. K. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1360612.1360638 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Agarwala, A., Dontcheva, M., Agrawala, M., Drucker, S., Colburn, A., Curless, B., Salesin, D., & Cohen, M.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-302
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2001933992
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 72.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactive digital photomontage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1015706.1015718
- The paper
- Agarwala, A., Dontcheva, M., Agrawala, M., Drucker, S., Colburn, A., Curless, B., Salesin, D., & Cohen, M. (2004). Interactive digital photomontage. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015706.1015718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.