The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks
Abstract
Previous approaches for computing duplicate-sensitive aggregates in sensor networks (e.g., in TAG) have used a tree topology, in order to conserve energy and to avoid double-counting sensor readings. However, a tree topology is not robust against node and communication failures, which are common in sensor networks. In this paper, we present synopsis diffusion, a general framework for achieving signi.cantly more accurate and reliable answers by combining energy-efficient multi-path routing schemes with techniques that avoid double-counting. Synopsis diffusion avoids double-counting through the use of order- and duplicate-insensitive (ODI) synopses that compactly summarize intermediate results during in-network aggregation. We provide a surprisingly simple test that makes it easy to check the correctness of an ODI synopsis. We show that the properties of ODI synopses and synopsis di.usion create implicit acknowledgments of packet delivery. We show that this property can, in turn, enable the system to adapt message routing to dynamic message loss conditions, even in the presence of asymmetric links. Finally, we illustrate, using extensive simulations, the significant robustness, accuracy, and energy-efficiency improvements of synopsis diffusion over previous approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
In-network aggregation techniques for wireless sensor networks: a survey
Fasolo, E., Rossi, M., Widmer, J., & Zorzi, M. (2007) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2007.358967 · Cited by 734
Data Streams: Algorithms and Applications
Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000002 · Cited by 718
Resource Management in Fog/Edge Computing: A Survey on Architectures, Infrastructure, and Algorithms
Hong, C.-H., & Varghese, B. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3326066 · Cited by 461
Secure hierarchical in-network aggregation in sensor networks
Chan, H., Perrig, A., & Song, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1180405.1180440 · Cited by 334
Over-the-air Function Computation in Sensor Networks
Abari, O., Rahul, H., & Katabi, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.02307 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Nath, S., Gibbons, P. B., Seshan, S., & Anderson, Z. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-11-03
- Pages
- 250-262
- OpenAlex
- W2126310747
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1031495.1031525
- The paper
- Nath, S., Gibbons, P. B., Seshan, S., & Anderson, Z. R. (2004). Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031495.1031525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.