The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paradigms for process interaction in distributed programs
Abstract
Distributed computations are concurrent programs in which processes communicate by message passing. Such programs typically execute on network architectures such as networks of workstations or distributed memory parallel machines (i.e., multicomputers such as hypercubes). Several paradigms—examples or models—for process interaction in distributed computations are described. These include networks of filters, clients, and servers, heartbeat algorithms, probe/echo algorithms, broadcast algorithms, token-passing algorithms, decentralized servers, and bags of tasks. These paradigms are appliable to numerous practical problems. They are illustrated by solving problems, including parallel sorting, file servers, computing the topology of a network, distributed termination detection, replicated databases, and parallel adaptive quadrature. Solutions to all problems are derived in a step-wise fashion from a general specification of the problem to a concrete solution. The derivations illustrate techniques for developing distributed algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system
Lamport, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359545.359563 · Cited by 8,488
The Byzantine generals problem
Lamport, L., Shostak, R., & Pease, M. (1982) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/357172.357176 · Cited by 6,023
Cited by
Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x · Cited by 1,386
The golden age of software architecture
Shaw, M., & Clements, P. (2006) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2006.58 · Cited by 271
Principled design of the modern Web architecture
Fielding, R. T., & Taylor, R. N. (2000) · Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '00 · doi:10.1145/337180.337228 · Cited by 263
Enabling high-level application development for the Internet of Things
Patel, P., & Cassou, D. (2015) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.027 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, G. R.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-90
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2057726682
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paradigms for process interaction in distributed programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/103162.103164
- The paper
- Andrews, G. R. (1991). Paradigms for process interaction in distributed programs. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/103162.103164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.