The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating paper prototypes on the street
Abstract
The evaluation of paper prototypes is normally conducted in controlled settings such as a usability lab. This paper, in contrast, reports on a study where evaluations of a paper prototype were performed on the street with young adults. We discuss the merits of this approach and how it impacted the design process. A key finding is that the street location can enfranchise people who may otherwise be under-represented in design. We conclude that evaluating paper prototypes in public, street settings is feasible and informative.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hendry et al. performed usability testing among home-less people and concluded that using a prototype in the streets enabled them to reach otherwise inaccessible user segments (Hendry et al. 2005).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Hendry et al. 2005
In the citing paper
“The choice of media may also affect the ease with which the prototype can be evaluated in some environments (Hendry et al. 2005).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Hendry et al. 2005
In the citing paper
“Finally, Hendry et al. found that paper sketches were a good media for eliciting and validating requirements in actual environments and with some stakeholder groups, such as in public locations where people of all age categories can be accessed (Hendry et al. 2005).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Hendry et al. 2005
In the citing paper
“A prototype can be constructed using a range of techniques and media, including sketching on paper (Hendry et al. 2005) or in PowerPoint, using a prototyping tool to produce a wireframe or a mock-up (Liu and Khooshabeh 2003), or using an early version of product software as your prototype (McCurdy et al. 2006;Sefelin et al. 2003).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Hendry et al. 2005
Citations
Cites
Kamb, M. L., Fishbein, M., Douglas, Jr., Rhodes, F., Rogers, J., Bolan, G., Zenilman, J., Hoxworth, T., Malotte, C. K., Iatesta, M., et al. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.13.1161 · Cited by 973 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, it is known that brief counseling in the clinical setting can lead to behavioral changes which, in turn, reduce the risk of contracting STIs [3,4].”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Eng , T. R. and Bulter , W. T . (Eds.). Epidemic: confronting Sexually transmitted diseases . National Academy of Press . Washington D.C. 1997 . Eng, T. R. and Bulter, W. T. (Eds.). Epidemic: confronting Sexually transmitted diseases. National Academy of Press. Washington D.C. 1997.
- Fogg , B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do , New York : Morgan Kaufmann , 2003 . Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, New York: Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
- O'Donnell CR , O'Donnell L , San Doval A , Duran R , Labes K . Reductions in STD infections subsequent to an STD clinic visit. Using video-based patient education to supplement provider interactions . Sex Transm Dis. , 25 , 3 ( 1998 ), 161--8. O'Donnell CR, O'Donnell L, San Doval A, Duran R, Labes K. Reductions in STD infections subsequent to an STD clinic visit. Using video-based patient education to supplement provider interactions. Sex Transm Dis., 25, 3 (1998), 161--8.
- Snyder , C. , Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy way to Design and Refine User Interfaces . New York : Morgan Kaufmann , 2003 . Snyder, C., Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy way to Design and Refine User Interfaces. New York: Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
Cited by
An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study
Bjarnason, E., Lang, F., & Mjöberg, A. (2023) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10331-w · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendry, D. G., Mackenzie, S., Kurth, A., Spielberg, F., & Larkin, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Resources Online, Seattle, WA
- Venue
- CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-04-02
- Pages
- 1447-1450
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating paper prototypes on the street. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1056808.1056938
- The paper
- Hendry, D. G., Mackenzie, S., Kurth, A., Spielberg, F., & Larkin, J. (2005). Evaluating paper prototypes on the street. CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
