Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing

·2004

Abstract

The Second Symposium on Geometry Processing continues the series started last year in Aachen. The increase in the number of submissions (18%) shows that the interest in the area continues to grow. The number of accepted papers has remained the same; only 29% of the submitted papers were accepted this year. Several changes were introduced to the review process in 2004. Practically all papers were reviewed by four reviewers. Once the reviews were completed, the committee members were able to access all other reviews and discuss acceptance and rejection recommendations. In a few cases, these through discussions resulted in signifi cant changes in the decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1057432

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Publisher
ACM
Published
2004-07-08
OpenAlex
W4255286169
Cited by
361
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1057432
The paper
Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1057432

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.