The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data exchange: getting to the core
Abstract
Data exchange is the problem of taking data structured under a source schema and creating an instance of a target schema that reflects the source data as accurately as possible. Given a source instance, there may be many solutions to the data exchange problem, that is, many target instances that satisfy the constraints of the data exchange problem. In an earlier article, we identified a special class of solutions that we call universal . A universal solution has homomorphisms into every possible solution, and hence is a “most general possible” solution. Nonetheless, given a source instance, there may be many universal solutions. This naturally raises the question of whether there is a “best” universal solution, and hence a best solution for data exchange. We answer this question by considering the well-known notion of the core of a structure, a notion that was first studied in graph theory, and has also played a role in conjunctive-query processing. The core of a structure is the smallest substructure that is also a homomorphic image of the structure. All universal solutions have the same core (up to isomorphism); we show that this core is also a universal solution, and hence the smallest universal solution. The uniqueness of the core of a universal solution together with its minimality make the core an ideal solution for data exchange. We investigate the computational complexity of producing the core. Well-known results by Chandra and Merlin imply that, unless P = NP, there is no polynomial-time algorithm that, given a structure as input, returns the core of that structure as output. In contrast, in the context of data exchange, we identify natural and fairly broad conditions under which there are polynomial-time algorithms for computing the core of a universal solution. We also analyze the computational complexity of the following decision problem that underlies the computation of cores: given two graphs G and H , is H the core of G ? Earlier results imply that this problem is both NP-hard and coNP-hard. Here, we pinpoint its exact complexity by establishing that it is a DP-complete problem. Finally, we show that the core is the best among all universal solutions for answering existential queries, and we propose an alternative semantics for answering queries in data exchange settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data exchange: semantics and query answering
Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P. G., Miller, R. J., & Popa, L. (2005) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2004.10.033 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citation
Cited by
Data exchange: semantics and query answering
Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P. G., Miller, R. J., & Popa, L. (2005) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2004.10.033 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationA Survey of Extract-Transform-Load Technology
Vassiliadis, P. (2009) · International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining · doi:10.4018/jdwm.2009070101 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P. G., & Popa, L.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-210
- ISSN
- 0362-5915 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-4644
- OpenAlex
- W2159686758
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data exchange: getting to the core. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1061318.1061323
- The paper
- Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P. G., & Popa, L. (2005). Data exchange: getting to the core. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1061318.1061323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.