The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What's hot and what's not: tracking most frequent items dynamically
Abstract
Most database management systems maintain statistics on the underlying relation. One of the important statistics is that of the “hot items” in the relation: those that appear many times (most frequently, or more than some threshold). For example, end-biased histograms keep the hot items as part of the histogram and are used in selectivity estimation. Hot items are used as simple outliers in data mining, and in anomaly detection in many applications.We present new methods for dynamically determining the hot items at any time in a relation which is undergoing deletion operations as well as inserts. Our methods maintain small space data structures that monitor the transactions on the relation, and, when required, quickly output all hot items without rescanning the relation in the database. With user-specified probability, all hot items are correctly reported. Our methods rely on ideas from “group testing.” They are simple to implement, and have provable quality, space, and time guarantees. Previously known algorithms for this problem that make similar quality and performance guarantees cannot handle deletions, and those that handle deletions cannot make similar guarantees without rescanning the database. Our experiments with real and synthetic data show that our algorithms are accurate in dynamically tracking the hot items independent of the rate of insertions and deletions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motwani, R., & Raghavan, P. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814075 · Cited by 5,123
Universal classes of hash functions
Carter, J. L., & Wegman, M. N. (1979) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(79)90044-8 · Cited by 2,519
Data Structures and Algorithms
(2003) · Series on software engineering and knowledge engineering · doi:10.1142/9789812791245 · Cited by 2,117
An improved data stream summary: the count-min sketch and its applications
Cormode, G., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · Journal of Algorithms · doi:10.1016/j.jalgor.2003.12.001 · Cited by 1,743
Self-citation(2005) · Complexity Theory · doi:10.1007/3-540-27477-4_15 · Cited by 1,629
Data Streams: Algorithms and Applications
Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781933019604 · Cited by 1,433
Self-citationFinding frequent items in data streams
Charikar, M., Chen, K., & Farach-Colton, M. (2004) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(03)00400-6 · Cited by 1,278
Approximate frequency counts over data streams
Manku, G. S., & Motwani, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/2367502.2367508 · Cited by 1,178
The Space Complexity of Approximating the Frequency Moments
Alon, N., Matias, Y., & Szegedy, M. (1999) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1545 · Cited by 1,140
Combinatorial Group Testing and Its Applications
Du, D.-Z., & Hwang, F. K. (1999) · Series on Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1142/9789812798107 · Cited by 773
Cited by
An improved data stream summary: the count-min sketch and its applications
Cormode, G., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · Journal of Algorithms · doi:10.1016/j.jalgor.2003.12.001 · Cited by 1,743
Self-citationOn the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages
Ghazi, B., Golowich, N., Kumar, R., Pagh, R., & Velingker, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.11358 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Cormode, G., & Muthukrishnan, S.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-278
- ISSN
- 0362-5915 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-4644
- OpenAlex
- W2167973519
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 67.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What's hot and what's not: tracking most frequent items dynamically. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1061318.1061325
- The paper
- Cormode, G., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2005). What's hot and what's not: tracking most frequent items dynamically. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1061318.1061325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.