The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reference reconciliation in complex information spaces
Abstract
Reference reconciliation is the problem of identifying when different references (i.e., sets of attribute values) in a dataset correspond to the same real-world entity. Most previous literature assumed references to a single class that had a fair number of attributes (e.g., research publications). We consider complex information spaces: our references belong to multiple related classes and each reference may have very few attribute values. A prime example of such a space is Personal Information Management, where the goal is to provide a coherent view of all the information on one's desktop.Our reconciliation algorithm has three principal features. First, we exploit the associations between references to design new methods for reference comparison. Second, we propagate information between reconciliation decisions to accumulate positive and negative evidences. Third, we gradually enrich references by merging attribute values. Our experiments show that (1) we considerably improve precision and recall over standard methods on a diverse set of personal information datasets, and (2) there are advantages to using our algorithm even on a standard citation dataset benchmark.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collective entity resolution in relational data
Bhattacharya, I., & Getoor, L. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/1217299.1217304 · Cited by 593
(2006) · doi:10.5555/1182635.1164130 · Cited by 553
Demartini, G., Difallah, D. E., & Cudré-Mauroux, P. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187900 · Cited by 448
Evaluation of entity resolution approaches on real-world match problems
Köpcke, H., Thor, A., & Rahm, E. (2010) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/1920841.1920904 · Cited by 443
Efficient exact set-similarity joins
Arasu, A., Ganti, V., & Kaushik, R. (2006) · doi:10.5555/1182635.1164206 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, X., Halevy, A., & Madhavan, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-06-14
- Pages
- 85-96
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046020929
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 67.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reference reconciliation in complex information spaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1066157.1066168
- The paper
- Dong, X., Halevy, A., & Madhavan, J. (2005). Reference reconciliation in complex information spaces. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. https://doi.org/10.1145/1066157.1066168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.