The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Substructure similarity search in graph databases
Abstract
Advanced database systems face a great challenge raised by the emergence of massive, complex structural data in bioinformatics, chem-informatics, and many other applications. The most fundamental support needed in these applications is the efficient search of complex structured data. Since exact matching is often too restrictive, similarity search of complex structures becomes a vital operation that must be supported efficiently.In this paper, we investigate the issues of substructure similarity search using indexed features in graph databases. By transforming the edge relaxation ratio of a query graph into the maximum allowed missing features, our structural filtering algorithm, called Grafil, can filter many graphs without performing pairwise similarity computations. It is further shown that using either too few or too many features can result in poor filtering performance. Thus the challenge is to design an effective feature set selection strategy for filtering. By examining the effect of different feature selection mechanisms, we develop a multi-filter composition strategy, where each filter uses a distinct and complementary subset of the features. We identify the criteria to form effective feature sets for filtering, and demonstrate that combining features with similar size and selectivity can improve the filtering and search performance significantly. Moreover, the concept presented in Grafil can be applied to searching approximate non-consecutive sequences, trees, and other complicated structures as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Artificial Intelligence
Nilsson, N. J. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09438-9 · Cited by 3,457 · cited 3×
“Nilsson[15] presented an algorithm for the pairwise approximate sub-”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
Self-citationTaming verification hardness: an efficient algorithm for testing subgraph isomorphism
Shang, H., Zhang, Y., Lin, X., & Yu, J. X. (2008) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/1453856.1453899 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, X., Yu, P. S., & Han, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-06-14
- Pages
- 766-777
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102913801
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substructure similarity search in graph databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1066157.1066244
- The paper
- Yan, X., Yu, P. S., & Han, J. (2005). Substructure similarity search in graph databases. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. https://doi.org/10.1145/1066157.1066244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.