The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An approach for QoS-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms
Abstract
Web services are rapidly changing the landscape of software engineering. One of the most interesting challenges introduced by web services is represented by Quality Of Service (QoS)--aware composition and late--binding. This allows to bind, at run--time, a service--oriented system with a set of services that, among those providing the required features, meet some non--functional constraints, and optimize criteria such as the overall cost or response time. In other words, QoS--aware composition can be modeled as an optimization problem.We propose to adopt Genetic Algorithms to this aim. Genetic Algorithms, while being slower than integer programming, represent a more scalable choice, and are more suitable to handle generic QoS attributes. The paper describes our approach and its applicability, advantages and weaknesses, discussing results of some numerical simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Software Architecture Optimization Methods: A Systematic Literature Review
Aleti, A., Buhnova, B., Grunske, L., Koziolek, A., & Meedeniya, I. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2012.64 · Cited by 293
A Study on Group Decision-Making in Software Architecture
Rekhav, V. S., & Muccini, H. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture · doi:10.1109/wicsa.2014.15 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Canfora, G., Di Penta, M., Esposito, R., & Villani, M. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-06-25
- Pages
- 1069-1075
- OpenAlex
- W2172105112
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.81
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
