The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A temporally adaptive content-based relevance ranking algorithm
Abstract
In information retrieval relevance ranking of the results is one of the most important single tasks there are. There are many diffierent ranking algorithms based on the content of the documents or on some external properties e.g. link structure of html documents.We present a temporally adaptive content-based relevance ranking algorithm that explicitly takes into account the temporal behavior of the underlying statistical properties of the documents in the form of a statistical topic model. more we state that our algorithm can be used on top of any ranking algorithm.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“[Perkiö et al. 2005] automatically detected topical trends and their importance over time within a news corpus using a simple variant of TF.IDF.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Perkiö et al. 2005
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1145/383952.383954 · DOI
- 10.1145/1008992.1009048 · DOI
- W. Buntine and A. Jakulin . Applying discrete PCA in data analysis . In UAI-2004 Banff , 2004 . W. Buntine and A. Jakulin.Applying discrete PCA in data analysis. In UAI-2004 Banff, 2004.
- L. Page , S. Brin , R. Motwani , and T. Winograd . The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report , Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project , 1998 . L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
- 10.5555/1025132.1026407 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Perkiö, J., Buntine, W., & Tirri, H.
- Affiliations
- Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, HUT, Finland
- Nokia Research Center
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-08-15
- Pages
- 647-648
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review