Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preventing shilling attacks in online recommender systems

Chirita, Paul-Alexandru, Nejdl, Wolfgang, Zamfir, Cristian·2005·Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data management

Abstract

Collaborative filtering techniques have been successfully employed in recommender systems in order to help users deal with information overload by making high quality personalized recommendations. However, such systems have been shown to be vulnerable to attacks in which malicious users with carefully chosen profiles are inserted into the system in order to push the predictions of some targeted items. In this paper we propose several metrics for analyzing rating patterns of malicious users and evaluate their potential for detecting such shilling attacks. Building upon these results, we propose and evaluate an algorithm for protecting recommender systems against shilling attacks. The algorithm can be employed for monitoring user ratings and removing shilling attacker profiles from the process of computing recommendations, thus maintaining the high quality of the recommendations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1097047.1097061

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chirita, P.-A., Nejdl, W., & Zamfir, C.
Venue
Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2005-11-04
Pages
67-74
OpenAlex
W2098121414
Cited by
309
References
0
FWCI
7.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.