The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Siphon: overload traffic management using multi-radio virtual sinks in sensor networks
Abstract
There is a critical need for new thinking regarding overload traffic management in sensor networks. It has now become clear that experimental sensor networks (e.g., mote networks) and their applications commonly experience periods of persistent congestion and high packet loss, and in some cases even congestion collapse. This significantly impacts application fidelity measured at the physical sinks, even under light to moderate traffic loads, and is a direct product of the funneling effect; that is, the many-to-one multi-hop traffic pattern that characterizes sensor network communications. Existing congestion control schemes are effective at mitigating congestion through rate control and packet drop mechanisms, but do so at the cost of significantly reducing application fidelity measured at the sinks. To address this problem we propose to exploit the availability of a small number of all wireless, multi-radio virtual sinks that can be randomly distributed or selectively placed across the sensor field. Virtual sinks are capable of siphoning off data events from regions of the sensor field that are beginning to show signs of high traffic load. In this paper, we present the design, implementation, and evaluation of Siphon, a set of fully distributed algorithms that support virtual sink discovery and selection, congestion detection, and traffic redirection in sensor networks. Siphon is based on a Stargate implementation of virtual sinks that uses a separate longer-range radio network (based on IEEE 802.11) to siphon events to one or more physical sinks, and a short-range mote radio to interact with the sensor field at siphon points. Results from analysis, simulation and an experimental 48 Mica2 mote testbed show that virtual sinks can scale mote networks by effectively managing growing traffic demands while minimizing the impact on application fidelity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Campbell, A. T., Eisenman, S. B., Lane, N. D., Miluzzo, E., & Peterson, R. A. (2006) · Proceedings of the 2nd annual international workshop on Wireless internet - WICON '06 · doi:10.1145/1234161.1234179 · Cited by 484
Self-citationConvergence of MANET and WSN in IoT Urban Scenarios
Bellavista, P., Cardone, G., Corradi, A., & Foschini, L. (2013) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2013.2272099 · Cited by 424
A survey of transport protocols for wireless sensor networks
Wang, C., Sohraby, K., Li, B., Daneshmand, M., & Hu, Y. (2006) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2006.1637930 · Cited by 359
From wireless sensor networks towards cyber physical systems
Wu, F.-J., Kao, Y.-F., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2011) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.03.003 · Cited by 329
Upstream congestion control in wireless sensor networks through cross-layer optimization
Wang, C., Li, B., Sohraby, K., Daneshmand, M., & Hu, Y. (2007) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2007.070514 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, C.-Y., Eisenman, S. B., Campbell, A. T., & Crowcroft, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-11-02
- Pages
- 116-129
- OpenAlex
- W2000234133
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Siphon: overload traffic management using multi-radio virtual sinks in sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1098918.1098931
- The paper
- Wan, C.-Y., Eisenman, S. B., Campbell, A. T., & Crowcroft, J. (2005). Siphon: overload traffic management using multi-radio virtual sinks in sensor networks. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1098918.1098931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.