Cited by 24Distributed systems and fault toleranceReliability and Maintenance OptimizationAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On unreliable computing systems when heavy-tails appear as a result of the recovery procedure

Fiorini, Pierre M., Sheahan, Robert, Lipsky, Lester·2005·ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review

Abstract

For some computing systems, failure is rare enough that it can be ignored. In other systems, failure is so common that how to handle it can have a significant impact on the performance of the system. There are many different recovery schemes for tasks, however, they can be classified into three broad categories: 1) Resume: when a task fails, it knows exactly where it stops and can continue at that point when allowed to resume (i.e., preemptive resume - prs); 2) Replace : when a task fails, then later when the processor continues, it begins with a brand new task (i.e., preemptive repeat different prd); and, 3) Restart: when a task fails it loses all work done to that point and must start anew upon continuing later (i.e., preemptive repeat identical - pri ).In this paper, assuming a computing system is unreliable, we discuss how heavy-tail (hereafter referred to as power-tail - PT) distributions can appear in a job's task stream given the Restart recovery procedure. This is an important consideration since it is known that power-tails can lead to unstable systems [4], We then demonstrate how to obtain performance and dependablity measures for a class of computing systems comprised of P unreliable processors and a finite number of tasks N given the above recovery procedures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1101892.1101898

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The generic channel with failures model results in power law distributions when the distributions of L and A have a matrix exponential representation.

    “It was first recognized in [6] that this model results in power law distributions when the distributions of L ≡ L ∞ and A have a matrix exponential representation, and this result was rigorously proved and further generalized in [3], [11], and [16].”
  • Restart mechanisms may result in long-tailed (power law) delays even if job sizes and failure rates are exponential.

    “It was first recognized in [6] and [19] that such mechanisms may result in long-tailed (power law) delays even if the job sizes and failure rates are exponential.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. A. Bobbio and K. Trivedi , " Computation of the Distribution of the Completion Time When the Work Requirement is a PH Random Variable ", Communications in Statistics - Stochastic Models , 1990 . A. Bobbio and K. Trivedi, "Computation of the Distribution of the Completion Time When the Work Requirement is a PH Random Variable", Communications in Statistics - Stochastic Models, 1990.
  2. 10.1287/opre.47.2.313 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/1427109 · DOI
  4. L. Lipsky , Queueing Theory: A Linear Algebraic Approach , MacMillan and Company , New York , 1992 . L. Lipsky, Queueing Theory: A Linear Algebraic Approach, MacMillan and Company, New York, 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fiorini, P. M., Sheahan, R., & Lipsky, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Maine (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
Published
2005-09
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
15-17
ISSN
0163-5999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994216358
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Keywords
heavy-tailed distributions, dependability, system stability, processor failures, performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review