The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast dictionary attacks on passwords using time-space tradeoff
Abstract
Human-memorable passwords are a mainstay of computer security. To decrease vulnerability of passwords to brute-force dictionary attacks, many organizations enforce complicated password-creation rules and require that passwords include numerals and special characters. We demonstrate that as long as passwords remain human-memorable, they are vulnerable to "smart-dictionary" attacks even when the space of potential passwords is large.Our first insight is that the distribution of letters in easy-to-remember passwords is likely to be similar to the distribution of letters in the users' native language. Using standard Markov modeling techniques from natural language processing, this can be used to dramatically reduce the size of the password space to be searched. Our second contribution is an algorithm for efficient enumeration of the remaining password space. This allows application of time-space tradeoff techniques, limiting memory accesses to a relatively small table of "partial dictionary" sizes and enabling a very fast dictionary attack.We evaluated our method on a database of real-world user password hashes. Our algorithm successfully recovered 67.6% of the passwords using a 2 x 109 search space. This is a much higher percentage than Oechslin's "rainbow" attack, which is the fastest currently known technique for searching large keyspaces. These results call into question viability of human-memorable character-sequence passwords as an authentication mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Cited by
Wang, D., Cheng, H., Wang, P., Huang, X., & Jian, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2017.2721359 · Cited by 499
Securing internet of medical things systems: limitations, issues and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P. A., Noura, M., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., Yaacoub, E., Couturier, R., & Chehab, A. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.12.028 · Cited by 308
Who Are You? A Statistical Approach to Measuring User Authenticity
Freeman, D., Jain, S., Duermuth, M., Biggio, B., & Giacinto, G. (2016) · Proceedings 2016 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2016.23240 · Cited by 123
Shahzad, A., Lee, M., Lee, Y.-K., Kim, S., Xiong, N., Choi, J.-Y., & Cho, Y. (2015) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym7031176 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-11-07
- Pages
- 364-372
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086553822
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast dictionary attacks on passwords using time-space tradeoff. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1102120.1102168
- The paper
- Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2005). Fast dictionary attacks on passwords using time-space tradeoff. Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1102120.1102168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.