Cited by 128Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningRobotic Path Planning Algorithms

Bounded real-time dynamic programming: RTDP with monotone upper bounds and performance guarantees

McMahan, H. Brendan, Likhachev, Maxim, Gordon, Geoffrey J.·2005·Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '05

Abstract

MDPs are an attractive formalization for planning, but realistic problems often have intractably large state spaces. When we only need a partial policy to get from a fixed start state to a goal, restricting computation to states relevant to this task can make much larger problems tractable. We introduce a new algorithm, Bounded RTDP, which can produce partial policies with strong performance guarantees while only touching a fraction of the state space, even on problems where other algorithms would have to visit the full state space. To do so, Bounded RTDP maintains both upper and lower bounds on the optimal value function. The performance of Bounded RTDP is greatly aided by the introduction of a new technique to efficiently find suitable upper bounds; this technique can also be used to provide informed initialization to a wide range of other planning algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1102351.1102423

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Planning algorithms have been extended to work with (partially observable) stochastic world models, with correctness maintained in the form of asymptotic convergence guarantees or guaranteed bounds.

    “However, planning algorithms have also been extended to work with (partially observable) stochastic world models (Bonet & Geffner, 2009), with correctness maintained in the form of asymptotic convergence guarantees (Bonet & Geffner, 2003) or guaranteed bounds (McMahan et al., 2005).”

    From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as McMahan et al., 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMahan, H. B., Likhachev, M., & Gordon, G. J.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '05
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2005
Pages
569-576
OpenAlex
W2116708838
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Keywords
real-time dynamic programming, Markov decision process, state space explosion, value function bounds, upper and lower bounds, performance guarantees, planning algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review