The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mining email social networks
Abstract
Communication & Co-ordination activities are central to large software projects, but are difficult to observe and study in traditional (closed-source, commercial) settings because of the prevalence of informal, direct communication modes. OSS projects, on the other hand, use the internet as the communication medium, and typically conduct discussions in an open, public manner. As a result, the email archives of OSS projects provide a useful trace of the communication and co-ordination activities of the participants. However, there are various challenges that must be addressed before this data can be effectively mined. Once this is done, we can construct social networks of email correspondents, and begin to address some interesting questions. These include questions relating to participation in the email; the social status of different types of OSS participants; the relationship of email activity and commit activity (in the CVS repositories) and the relationship of social status with commit activity. In this paper, we begin with a discussion of our infrastructure and then discuss our approach to mining the email archives; and finally we present some preliminary results from our data analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
The social structure of free and open source software development
Crowston, K., & Howison, J. (2005) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v10i2.1207 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data
University of Texas at Austin, Howison, J., Wiggins, A., Syracuse University, Crowston, K., & Syracuse University (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00282 · Cited by 369
(2018) · doi:10.1145/3180155.3180209 · Cited by 98
Weißgerber, P., Neu, D., & Diehl, S. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories · doi:10.1145/1370750.1370767 · Cited by 90
Ma, Y., Dey, T., Bogart, C., Amreen, S., Valiev, M., Tutko, A., Kennard, D., Zaretzki, R., & Mockus, A. (2021) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-020-09905-9 · Cited by 49
Open Source Software Sustainability: Combining Institutional Analysis and Socio-Technical Networks
Yin, L., Chakraborti, M., Yan, Y., Schweik, C., Frey, S., & Filkov, V. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555129 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Bird, C., Gourley, A., Devanbu, P., Gertz, M., & Swaminathan, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-05-22
- Pages
- 137-143
- OpenAlex
- W2076279155
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.