The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectral clustering for multi-type relational data
Abstract
Clustering on multi-type relational data has attracted more and more attention in recent years due to its high impact on various important applications, such as Web mining, e-commerce and bioinformatics. However, the research on general multi-type relational data clustering is still limited and preliminary. The contribution of the paper is three-fold. First, we propose a general model, the collective factorization on related matrices, for multi-type relational data clustering. The model is applicable to relational data with various structures. Second, under this model, we derive a novel algorithm, the spectral relational clustering, to cluster multi-type interrelated data objects simultaneously. The algorithm iteratively embeds each type of data objects into low dimensional spaces and benefits from the interactions among the hidden structures of different types of data objects. Extensive experiments demonstrate the promise and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Third, we show that the existing spectral clustering algorithms can be considered as the special cases of the proposed model and algorithm. This demonstrates the good theoretic generality of the proposed model and algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
The information bottleneck method
Tishby, N., Pereira, F. C., & Bialek, W. (2000) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0004057 · Cited by 2,626 · cited 2×
“In this study, first, we propose a general model, the collective factorization on related matrices, to discover the hidden structures of multi-types of objects based on both feature information and relation information.”
BackgroundMethodLeveraging relational autocorrelation with latent group models
Neville, J., & Jensen, D. (2005) · Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Multi-relational mining - MRDM '05 · doi:10.1145/1090193.1090201 · Cited by 121
Cited by
Feature Selection: A Data Perspective
Li, J., Cheng, K., Wang, S., Morstatter, F., Trevino, R. P., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3136625 · Cited by 2,442
Relational learning via collective matrix factorization
Singh, A. P., & Gordon, G. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1401890.1401969 · Cited by 1,204
A survey of heterogeneous information network analysis
Shi, C., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Sun, Y., & Yu, P. S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2016.2598561 · Cited by 1,112
Self-citationFeature selection for classification: A review
Tang, J., Alelyani, S., & Liu, H. (2014) · doi:10.1201/b17320-7 · Cited by 757
Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema
Sun, Y., Yu, Y., & Han, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1557019.1557107 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, B., Zhang, Z. (., Wú, X., & Yu, P. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 585-592
- OpenAlex
- W2138180870
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectral clustering for multi-type relational data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1143844.1143918
- The paper
- Long, B., Zhang, Z. (., Wú, X., & Yu, P. S. (2006). Spectral clustering for multi-type relational data. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06. https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.