The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stable distributions, pseudorandom generators, embeddings, and data stream computation
Abstract
In this article, we show several results obtained by combining the use of stable distributions with pseudorandom generators for bounded space . In particular:---We show that, for any p ∈ (0, 2], one can maintain (using only O (log n /ϵ 2 ) words of storage) a sketch C(q) of a point q ∈ l n p under dynamic updates of its coordinates. The sketch has the property that, given C(q) and C(s) , one can estimate ‖ q − s ‖ p up to a factor of (1 + ϵ) with large probability. This solves the main open problem of Feigenbaum et al. [1999].---We show that the aforementioned sketching approach directly translates into an approximate algorithm that, for a fixed linear mapping A , and given x ∈ ℜ n and y ∈ ℜ m , estimates ‖ Ax − y ‖ p in O ( n + m ) time, for any p ∈ (0, 2]. This generalizes an earlier algorithm of Wasserman and Blum [1997] which worked for the case p = 2.---We obtain another sketch function C ′ which probabilistically embeds l n 1 into a normed space l m 1 . The embedding guarantees that, if we set m = log(1/δ) O (1/ϵ) , then for any pair of points q , s ∈ l n 1 , the distance between q and s does not increase by more than (1 + ϵ) with constant probability, and it does not decrease by more than (1 − ϵ) with probability 1 − δ. This is the only known dimensionality reduction theorem for the l 1 norm. In fact, stronger theorems of this type (i.e., that guarantee very low probability of expansion as well as of contraction) cannot exist [Brinkman and Charikar 2003].---We give an explicit embedding of l n 2 into l n O (log n ) 1 with distortion (1 + 1/ n Θ(1) ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality
Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '98 · doi:10.1145/276698.276876 · Cited by 4,188
Self-citation
Cited by
Computational Advertising: Techniques for Targeting Relevant Ads
Woodruff, D. P. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000060 · Cited by 866
Kang, U., Tong, H., & Sun, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972825.71 · Cited by 127
Principles of hash-based text retrieval
Stein, B. (2007) · Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/1277741.1277832 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Indyk, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-323
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2045533739
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stable distributions, pseudorandom generators, embeddings, and data stream computation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1147954.1147955
- The paper
- Indyk, P. (2006). Stable distributions, pseudorandom generators, embeddings, and data stream computation. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1147954.1147955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.