Cited by 166Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovative Human-Technology InteractionAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Social influence on technology acceptance behavior: self-identity theory perspective

Lee, Younghwa, Lee, Jintae, Lee, Zoonky·2006·ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems

Abstract

Social influence on technology acceptance behavior has been acknowledged but needs to be further articulated. While Subjective Norm (SN) has been dominantly used to capture the essence of social influence, the findings to date has led some researchers to question whether it captures the full extent of social influence. Recently, social psychologists have examined Self-Identity as a construct reflecting social influence on behavior. In particular, Self-Identity has been shown to have significant influence on voluntary behavior and have enduring effects, situations where the Subjective Norm had little effect. This study examines the effect of Self-Identity on technology acceptance decision in the context of a web-based class support system under the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The result demonstrates a significant direct and indirect effect of Self-Identity on technology acceptance. The result also confirms that Self-Identity has significant direct effect on the acceptance in voluntary and experienced situations, while Subjective Norm has no significant effect in both situations. Key implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1161345.1161355

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Users who had their Competence Need more fulfilled after using the Banking Bot perceived the use as more in line with their self-image.

    “it can be derived that users who had their Competence Need more fulfilled after using the Banking Bot, perceived the use as more in line with their self-image.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Colorado
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Venue
ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
Published
2006-09-19
Volume
37
Issue
2-3
Pages
60-75
ISSN
  • 0095-0033 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-0936
OpenAlex
W2132732146
Cited by
166
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
social influence, technology acceptance, self-identity, subjective norms, technology acceptance model, voluntary behavior, experienced users, online learning platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review