The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Google file system
Abstract
We have designed and implemented the Google File Sys-tem, a scalable distributed file system for large distributed data-intensive applications. It provides fault tolerance while running on inexpensive commodity hardware, and it delivers high aggregate performance to a large number of clients. While sharing many of the same goals as previous dis-tributed file systems, our design has been driven by obser-vations of our application workloads and technological envi-ronment, both current and anticipated, that reflect a marked departure from some earlier file system assumptions. This has led us to reexamine traditional choices and explore rad-ically different design points. The file system has successfully met our storage needs. It is widely deployed within Google as the storage platform for the generation and processing of data used by our ser-vice as well as research and development efforts that require large data sets. The largest cluster to date provides hun-dreds of terabytes of storage across thousands of disks on over a thousand machines, and it is concurrently accessed by hundreds of clients. In this paper, we present file system interface extensions designed to support distributed applications, discuss many aspects of our design, and report measurements from both micro-benchmarks and real world use. Categories and Subject Descriptors D [4]: 3—Distributed file systems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters
Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327492 · Cited by 18,476
Self-citationBoyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Edge computing: Vision and challenges
Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2579198 · Cited by 8,733
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1294261.1294281 · Cited by 3,447
Chen, M., Mao, S., & Liu, Y. (2014) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0489-0 · Cited by 2,913
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., & Leung, S.-T.
- Venue
- ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
- Published
- 2003-10-19
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 29-43
- ISSN
- 0163-5980 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119565742
- Cited by
- 4,984
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Google file system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1165389.945450
- The paper
- Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., & Leung, S.-T. (2003). The Google file system. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/1165389.945450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.