The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition
Abstract
The home deployment of sensor-based systems offers many opportunities, particularly in the area of using sensor-based systems to support aging in place by monitoring an elder's activities of daily living. But existing approaches to home activity recognition are typically expensive, difficult to install, or intrude into the living space. This paper considers the feasibility of a new approach that "reaches into the home" via the existing infrastructure. Specifically, we deploy a small number of low-cost sensors at critical locations in a home's water distribution infrastructure. Based on water usage patterns, we can then infer activities in the home. To examine the feasibility of this approach, we deployed real sensors into a real home for six weeks. Among other findings, we show that a model built on microphone-based sensors that are placed away from systematic noise sources can identify 100% of clothes washer usage, 95% of dishwasher usage, 94% of showers, 88% of toilet flushes, 73% of bathroom sink activity lasting ten seconds or longer, and 81% of kitchen sink activity lasting ten seconds or longer. While there are clear limits to what activities can be detected when analyzing water usage, our new approach represents a sweet spot in the tradeoff between what information is collected at what cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital Family Portrait Field Trial: Support for Aging in Place
Rowan, J., & Mynatt, E. D. (2005) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1054972.1055044 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Sensor-Based Activity Recognition
Chen, L., Hoey, J., Nugent, C. D., Cook, D. J., & Yu, Z. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2012.2198883 · Cited by 1,074
Accurate activity recognition in a home setting
van Kasteren, T., Noulas, A., Englebienne, G., & Kröse, B. (2008) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing · doi:10.1145/1409635.1409637 · Cited by 874
Gupta, S., Reynolds, M. S., & Patel, S. N. (2010) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing · doi:10.1145/1864349.1864375 · Cited by 422
ViBand: High-Fidelity Bio-Acoustic Sensing Using Commodity Smartwatch Accelerometers
Laput, G., Xiao, R., & Harrison, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/2984511.2984582 · Cited by 265
Performance metrics for activity recognition
Ward, J. A., Lukowicz, P., & Gellersen, H. W. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1889681.1889687 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Fogarty, J., Au, C., & Hudson, S. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-10-15
- Pages
- 91-100
- OpenAlex
- W2159999338
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1166253.1166269
- The paper
- Fogarty, J., Au, C., & Hudson, S. E. (2006). Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.