Taming the inaccessible web
Abstract
Visually impaired users are hindered in their efforts to access the largest repository of electronic information in the world, namely the World Wide Web (Web). A visually impaired users information and presentation requirements are different from a sighted user in that they are highly egocentric and non-visual. These requirements can become problems in that the Web is visually centric with regard to presentation and information order/layout, this can (and does) hinder users who need presentation-agnostic access to information. Finding semantic information already encoded directly into documents can help to alleviate these problems and support users who wish to understand the content as opposed to the presentation and order of the information. If this is to happen in the "real world", however, authors must incur no "design overhead" when creating documents. Our solution, Structural-Semantics for Accessibility and Device Independence (SADIe) involves building ontologies of Cascading Sytle-Sheets (CSS) and using those ontologies to transformWeb pages. In this way we find that we can indeed "tame" inaccessible Web pages
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems
The University of North Carolina - Greensboro, Babu, R., Singh, R., The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, U., Ganesh, J., & Limited, I. T. (2010) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00015 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harper, S., Bechhofer, S., & Lunn, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-10-18
- Volume
- 3928
- Pages
- 64-69
- OpenAlex
- W2066431001
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC) (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- web accessibility, visual impairment, semantic web, ontology (information science), Cascading Style Sheets, device independence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review