The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Swing & swap: user-centric approaches towards maximizing location privacy
Abstract
In wireless networks, the location tracking of devices and vehicles (nodes) based on their identifiable and locatable broadcasts, presents potential threats to the location privacy of their users. While the tracking of nodes can be mitigated to an extent by updating their identifiers to decorrelate their traversed locations, such an approach is still vulnerable to tracking methods that utilize the predictability of node movement to limit the location privacy provided by the identifier updates. On the other hand, since each user may need privacy at different locations and times, a user-centric approach is needed to enable the nodes to independently determine where/when to update their identifiers. However, mitigation of tracking with a user-centric approach is difficult due to the lack of synchronization between updating nodes. This paper addresses the challenges to providing location privacy by identifier updates due to the predictability of node locations and the asynchronous updates, and proposes a user-centric scheme called Swing that increases location privacy by enabling the nodes to loosely synchronize updates when changing their velocity. Further, since each identifier update inherently trades off network service for privacy, the paper also introduces an approach called Swap, which is an extension of Swing, that enables the nodes to exchange their identifiers to potentially maximize the location privacy provided by each update, hence reducing the number of updates needed to meet the desired privacy levels. The performance of the proposed schemes is evaluated under random and restricted pedestrian mobility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system
Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2002) · Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2000.832252 · Cited by 8,380
Cited by
Pseudonym Schemes in Vehicular Networks: A Survey
Petit, J., Schaub, F., Feiri, M., & Kargl, F. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2345420 · Cited by 434
AMOEBA: Robust Location Privacy Scheme for VANET
Sampigethaya, K., Li, M., Huang, L., & Poovendran, R. (2007) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2007.071007 · Cited by 391
Self-citationVirtual trip lines for distributed privacy-preserving traffic monitoring
Hoh, B., Gruteser, M., Herring, R., Ban, J., Work, D., Herrera, J.-C., Bayen, A. M., Annavaram, M., & Jacobson, Q. (2008) · Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/1378600.1378604 · Cited by 351
Abdelzaher, T., Anokwa, Y., Boda, P., Burke, J., Estrin, D., Guibas, L., Kansal, A., Madden, S., & Reich, J. (2007) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2007.38 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., Sampigethaya, K., Huang, L., & Poovendran, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on Privacy in electronic society
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-10-30
- Pages
- 19-28
- OpenAlex
- W2086596492
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Swing & swap: user-centric approaches towards maximizing location privacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1179601.1179605
- The paper
- Li, M., Sampigethaya, K., Huang, L., & Poovendran, R. (2006). Swing & swap: user-centric approaches towards maximizing location privacy. Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on Privacy in electronic society. https://doi.org/10.1145/1179601.1179605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.