The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-signatures in the plain public-Key model and a general forking lemma
Abstract
A multi-signature scheme enables a group of signers to produce a compact, joint signature on a common document, and has many potential uses. However, existing schemes impose key setup or PKI requirements that make them impractical, such as requiring a dedicated, distributed key generation protocol amongst potential signers, or assuming strong, concurrent zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge of secret keys done to the CA at key registration. These requirements limit the use of the schemes. We provide a new scheme that is proven secure in the plain public-key model, meaning requires nothing more than that each signer has a (certified) public key. Furthermore, the important simplification in key management achieved is not at the cost of efficiency or assurance: our scheme matches or surpasses known ones in terms of signing time, verification time and signature size, and is proven secure in the random-oracle model under a standard (not bilinear map related) assumption. The proof is based on a simplified and general Forking Lemma that may be of independent interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Secure Cloud Storage
Wang, C., Chow, S. S. M., Wang, Q., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2011.245 · Cited by 1,374
Unidirectional Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-encryption
Libert, B., & Vergnaud, D. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78440-1_21 · Cited by 339
Compact Multi-signatures for Smaller Blockchains
Boneh, D., Drijvers, M., & Neven, G. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03329-3_15 · Cited by 299
Self-citationSurvivable key compromise in software update systems
Samuel, J., Mathewson, N., Cappos, J., & Dingledine, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1866307.1866315 · Cited by 120
Chaudhary, D., Santhi, P., Durgarao, M. S. P., Padmavathi, A., Mehedi Hassan, M., & Fahad Alkhamees, B. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3434691 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellare, M., & Neven, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-10-30
- Pages
- 390-399
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164736940
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.81
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-signatures in the plain public-Key model and a general forking lemma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1180405.1180453
- The paper
- Bellare, M., & Neven, G. (2006). Multi-signatures in the plain public-Key model and a general forking lemma. Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180405.1180453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.