The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '06
Open accessAbstract
Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2018, Torino, Italy, October 22-26, 2018
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of the recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks
Khan, A., Sohail, A., Zahoora, U., & Qureshi, A. S. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09825-6 · Cited by 3,137
Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., D’amato, C., Melo, G. D., Gutierrez, C., Kirrane, S., Gayo, J. E. L., Navigli, R., Neumaier, S., et al. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3447772 · Cited by 1,904
Sentiment analysis using product review data
Fang, X., & Zhan, J. (2015) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-015-0015-2 · Cited by 788
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W4205171160
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '06. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1183614
- The paper
- Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '06. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1183614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
