Cited by 735Algorithms and Data CompressionAdvanced Database Systems and Queriessemigroups and automata theory

Compressed full-text indexes

Navarro, Gonzalo, Mäkinen, Veli·2007·ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract

Full-text indexes provide fast substring search over large text collections. A serious problem of these indexes has traditionally been their space consumption. A recent trend is to develop indexes that exploit the compressibility of the text, so that their size is a function of the compressed text length. This concept has evolved into self-indexes , which in addition contain enough information to reproduce any text portion, so they replace the text. The exciting possibility of an index that takes space close to that of the compressed text, replaces it, and in addition provides fast search over it, has triggered a wealth of activity and produced surprising results in a very short time, which radically changed the status of this area in less than 5 years. The most successful indexes nowadays are able to obtain almost optimal space and search time simultaneously. In this article we present the main concepts underlying (compressed) self-indexes. We explain the relationship between text entropy and regularities that show up in index structures and permit compressing them. Then we cover the most relevant self-indexes, focusing on how they exploit text compressibility to achieve compact structures that can efficiently solve various search problems. Our aim is to give the background to understand and follow the developments in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1216370.1216372

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Lwords algorithm can perform its sequence comparison alignment-free approach for 29 primates' genomes, ranging from 14 to 25 Mbp, in just 66 seconds.

    “It can perform its sequence comparison alignment-free approach for 29 primates' genomes (ranging from 14 to 25 Mbp) in just 66 s.”
  • The Lwords algorithm performs well when there are significant repetitions in the input data, but it can be ineffective for data with minimal redundancy.

    “It performs well when there are significant repetitions in the input data; however, it can be ineffective for data with minimal redundancy [22].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Navarro, G., & Mäkinen, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Chile (CL)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2007-04-12
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
2
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
OpenAlex
W2088386938
Cited by
735
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 61
FWCI
72.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
Keywords
text compression, substring search, space-efficient indexing, search time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review