The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supporting multidisciplinary collaboration: requirements from novel HCI education
Abstract
Many collaborative design tools may suffer from being too generic to address the specific complexities inherent in multidisciplinary collaboration. We provide accounts of several multidisciplinary HCI courses at our institution, elaborating on the challenges student teams face when integrating design practice from a wide variety of disciplines. Of particular interest are the distinct approaches that these multidisciplinary teams adopt that differ from more common forms of collaborative design. We suggest reasons for the poor rate of adoption of existing collaborative support tools and outline specific suggestions for directions in both ethnographic studies of multidisciplinary collaboration and collaborative systems design.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the already acknowledged problems characterizing multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary research and practice, such as mismatches in goals, assumptions, practices, and understandings (cf. Adamczyk and Twidale, 2007; Murer et al., 2014; Rau et al., 2013) pictured also in our work, even if those did not turn out to be critical issues hindering our project.”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Adamczyk and Twidale, 2007
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Denton , H.G. Multidisciplinary team-based project work: planning factors. Design Studies , 18 , 1997 . 155--170. Denton, H.G. Multidisciplinary team-based project work: planning factors. Design Studies, 18, 1997. 155--170.
- 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2005.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1145/1056224.1056249 · DOI
- 10.1145/1013115.1013131 · DOI
- Mathes , A. Folksonomies -- Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata , April 10 , 2005 , http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html. Mathes, A. Folksonomies -- Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata, April 10, 2005, http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html.
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.013 · DOI
- Sonnenwald , D.H. Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies , 17 , 1996 . 277--301. Sonnenwald, D.H. Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17, 1996. 277--301.
- 10.1016/0306-4573(95)00002-X · DOI
- 10.5555/77786.77864 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2005.07.004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Study
Piorkowski, D., Park, S., Wang, A. Y., Wang, D., Muller, M., & Portnoy, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449205 · Cited by 151
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., & Molin-Juustila, T. (2023) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8 · Cited by 6
“…multi-, inter-and transdisciplinary research and practice, such as mismatches in goals, assumptions, practices, and understandings (cf. Adamczyk and Twidale, 2007; Murer et al., 2014; Rau et al., 2013) pictured also in our work, even if those did not turn out to be critical issues…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Adamczyk, P. D., & Twidale, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-04-29
- Pages
- 1073-1076
- OpenAlex
- W1973973460
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 19.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- multidisciplinary collaboration, collaborative design tools, human-computer interaction education, student teams
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
