Netprobe: a fast and scalable system for fraud detection in online auction networks
Abstract
Given a large online network of online auction users and their histories of transactions, how can we spot anomalies and auction fraud? This paper describes the design and implementation of NetProbe, a system that we propose for solving this problem. NetProbe models auction users and transactions as a Markov Random Field tuned to detect the suspicious patterns that fraudsters create, and employs a Belief Propagation mechanism to detect likely fraudsters. Our experiments show that NetProbe is both efficient and effective for fraud detection. We report experiments on synthetic graphs with as many as 7,000 nodes and 30,000 edges, where NetProbe was able to spot fraudulent nodes with over 90% precision and recall, within a matter of seconds. We also report experiments on a real dataset crawled from eBay, with nearly 700,000 transactions between more than 66,000users, where NetProbe was highly effective at unearthing hidden networks of fraudsters, within a realistic response time of about 6 minutes. For scenarios where the underlying data is dynamic in nature, we propose IncrementalNetProbe, which is an approximate, but fast, variant of NetProbe. Our experiments prove that Incremental NetProbe executes nearly doubly fast as compared to NetProbe, while retaining over 99% of its accuracy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SIM cards can help attribute sockpuppet accounts to the ASO workers who control them.
“SIM cards can also help attribute sockpuppet accounts to the ASO workers who control them, see e.g., [41].”
From The Art and Craft of Fraudulent App Promotion in Google Play (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
The lockstep signature is unlikely to form naturally and is highly correlated to fraudulent activities.
“this signature is unlikely to form naturally and highly correlated to fraudulent activities [30, 57, 73]”
From Six Million (Suspected) Fake Stars on GitHub: A Growing Spiral of Popularity Contests, Spams, and Malware (2026) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 382
- Authors
- Pandit, S., Chau, D. H., Wang, S., & Faloutsos, C.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-05-08
- Pages
- 201-210
- OpenAlex
- W2148123869
- Semantic Scholar
- ab6629e4f33443c2f9a7a58c9adc1a936d920f93
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Markov random fields, belief propagation, social network analysis, eBay, dynamic graphs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review