The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks
Abstract
Power management is an important concern in sensor networks, because a tethered energy infrastructure is usually not available and an obvious concern is to use the available battery energy efficiently. However, in some of the sensor networking applications, an additional facility is available to ameliorate the energy problem: harvesting energy from the environment. Certain considerations in using an energy harvesting source are fundamentally different from that in using a battery, because, rather than a limit on the maximum energy, it has a limit on the maximum rate at which the energy can be used. Further, the harvested energy availability typically varies with time in a nondeterministic manner. While a deterministic metric, such as residual battery, suffices to characterize the energy availability in the case of batteries, a more sophisticated characterization may be required for a harvesting source. Another issue that becomes important in networked systems with multiple harvesting nodes is that different nodes may have different harvesting opportunity. In a distributed application, the same end-user performance may be achieved using different workload allocations, and resultant energy consumptions at multiple nodes. In this case, it is important to align the workload allocation with the energy availability at the harvesting nodes. We consider the above issues in power management for energy-harvesting sensor networks. We develop abstractions to characterize the complex time varying nature of such sources with analytically tractable models and use them to address key design issues. We also develop distributed methods to efficiently use harvested energy and test these both in simulation and experimentally on an energy-harvesting sensor network, prototyped for this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human-powered wearable computing
Starner, T. (1996) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.353.0618 · Cited by 876
Cited by
Energy Harvesting Wireless Communications: A Review of Recent Advances
Ulukus, S., Yener, A., Erkip, E., Simeone, O., Zorzi, M., Grover, P., & Huang, K. (2015) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2015.2391531 · Cited by 805
Advances in Energy Harvesting Communications: Past, Present, and Future Challenges
Ku, M.-L., Li, W., Chen, Y., & Ray Liu, K. J. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2497324 · Cited by 606
AI-Based Joint Optimization of QoS and Security for 6G Energy Harvesting Internet of Things
Mao, B., Kawamoto, Y., & Kato, N. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2982417 · Cited by 228
Movers and shakers: kinetic energy harvesting for the internet of things
Gorlatova, M., Sarik, J., Grebla, G., Cong, M., Kymissis, I., & Zussman, G. (2014) · The 2014 ACM international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems · doi:10.1145/2591971.2591986 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Kansal, A., Hsu, J., Zahedi, S., & Srivastava, M. B.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 32
- ISSN
- 1539-9087 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3465
- OpenAlex
- W1991781995
- Cited by
- 1,533
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 66.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1274858.1274870
- The paper
- Kansal, A., Hsu, J., Zahedi, S., & Srivastava, M. B. (2007). Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1274858.1274870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.