The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gossip-based peer sampling
Open accessAbstract
Gossip-based communication protocols are appealing in large-scale distributed applications such as information dissemination, aggregation, and overlay topology management. This paper factors out a fundamental mechanism at the heart of all these protocols: the peer-sampling service. In short, this service provides every node with peers to gossip with. We promote this service to the level of a first-class abstraction of a large-scale distributed system, similar to a name service being a first-class abstraction of a local-area system. We present a generic framework to implement a peer-sampling service in a decentralized manner by constructing and maintaining dynamic unstructured overlays through gossiping membership information itself. Our framework generalizes existing approaches and makes it easy to discover new ones. We use this framework to empirically explore and compare several implementations of the peer-sampling service. Through extensive simulation experiments we show that---although all protocols provide a good quality uniform random stream of peers to each node locally---traditional theoretical assumptions about the randomness of the unstructured overlays as a whole do not hold in any of the instances. We also show that different design decisions result in severe differences from the point of view of two crucial aspects: load balancing and fault tolerance. Our simulations are validated by means of a wide-area implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications
Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383071 · Cited by 9,623
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems
Rowstron, A., & Druschel, P. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45518-3_18 · Cited by 7,276
Error and attack tolerance of complex networksPreprint
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2000) · Cited by 6,467
A scalable content-addressable network
Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., & Shenker, S. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383072 · Cited by 6,372
An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications
Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (2019) · Texts in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11298-1 · Cited by 3,681
Dorogovtsev, S. N., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2002) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018730110112519 · Cited by 3,171
Linked: The New Science of Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Aldana-Gonzalez, M. (2003) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.1570778 · Cited by 2,724
Cited by
PeerSim: A scalable P2P simulator
Montresor, A., & Jelasity, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing · doi:10.1109/p2p.2009.5284506 · Cited by 579
Self-citationA survey on content-centric technologies for the current Internet: CDN and P2P solutions
Passarella, A. (2012) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2011.10.005 · Cited by 226
Fully Decentralized Joint Learning of Personalized Models and Collaboration Graphs
Zantedeschi, V., Bellet, A., & Tommasi, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.08460 · Cited by 38
Want to scale in centralized systems? Think P2P
Kermarrec, A.-M., & Taïani, F. (2015) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-015-0029-1 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jelasity, M., Voulgaris, S., Guerraoui, R., Kermarrec, A.-M., & van Steen, M.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer Systems
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 8
- ISSN
- 0734-2071 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7333
- OpenAlex
- W2126147068
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 56.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gossip-based peer sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1275517.1275520
- The paper
- Jelasity, M., Voulgaris, S., Guerraoui, R., Kermarrec, A.-M., & van Steen, M. (2007). Gossip-based peer sampling. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1275517.1275520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.