The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Image-based procedural modeling of facades
Abstract
This paper describes algorithms to automatically derive 3D models of high visual quality from single facade images of arbitrary resolutions. We combine the procedural modeling pipeline of shape grammars with image analysis to derive a meaningful hierarchical facade subdivision. Our system gives rise to three exciting applications: urban reconstruction based on low resolution oblique aerial imagery, reconstruction of facades based on higher resolution ground-based imagery, and the automatic derivation of shape grammar rules from facade images to build a rule base for procedural modeling technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Historic building information modelling (HBIM)
Murphy, M., McGovern, E., & Pavia, S. (2009) · Structural Survey · doi:10.1108/02630800910985108 · Cited by 580
City Forensics: Using Visual Elements to Predict Non-Visual City Attributes
Arietta, S. M., Efros, A. A., Ramamoorthi, R., & Agrawala, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346446 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, P., Zeng, G., Wonka, P., & Van Gool, L.
- Venue
- ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-07-29
- Pages
- 85
- OpenAlex
- W2132455584
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image-based procedural modeling of facades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1275808.1276484
- The paper
- Müller, P., Zeng, G., Wonka, P., & Van Gool, L. (2007). Image-based procedural modeling of facades. ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers. https://doi.org/10.1145/1275808.1276484
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
