The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A note on efficient zero-knowledge proofs and arguments (extended abstract)
Open accessAbstract
In this note, we present new zero-knowledge interactive proofs and arguments for languages in NP. To show that x ε L, with an error probability of at most 2-k, our zero-knowledge proof system requires O(|x|c1)+O(lgc2|x|)k ideal bit commitments, where c1 and c2 depend only on L. This construction is the first in the ideal bit commitment model that achieves large values of k more efficiently than by running k independent iterations of the base interactive proof system. Under suitable complexity assumptions, we exhibit zero knowledge arguments that require O(lgc|x|kl bits of communication, where c depends only on L, and l is the security parameter for the prover. This is the first construction in which the total amount of communication can be less than that needed to transmit the NP witness. Our protocols are based on efficiently checkable proofs for NP[4].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing - STOC '87 · doi:10.1145/28395.28420 · Cited by 3,590
Cited by
On the Size of Pairing-Based Non-interactive Arguments
Groth, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49896-5_11 · Cited by 1,271
Pinocchio: Nearly Practical Verifiable Computation
Parno, B., Howell, J., Gentry, C., & Raykova, M. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.47 · Cited by 864
Bitansky, N., Canetti, R., Chiesa, A., & Tromer, E. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090263 · Cited by 493
Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted Setup
Ames, S., Hazay, C., Ishai, Y., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134104 · Cited by 305
Recursive composition and bootstrapping for SNARKS and proof-carrying data
Bitansky, N., Canetti, R., Chiesa, A., & Tromer, E. (2013) · Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing · doi:10.1145/2488608.2488623 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Kilian, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '92
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 723-732
- OpenAlex
- W2067596507
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A note on efficient zero-knowledge proofs and arguments (extended abstract). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/129712.129782
- The paper
- Kilian, J. (1992). A note on efficient zero-knowledge proofs and arguments (extended abstract). Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '92. https://doi.org/10.1145/129712.129782
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
